© 2004 by Oxford University Press
© 2004 Oxford University Press
ARTICLE |
Five-Year Outcomes After Prostatectomy or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: The Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study
Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (ALP, WWD, LCH); New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque (RMH); Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (JLS); Division of Urology, University of Utah Department of Medicine, Salt Lake City (RAS); Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Cancer Center, Los Angeles, and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (DFP)
Correspondence to: Arnold L. Potosky, PhD, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, EPN Rm. 4005, 6130 Executive Blvd., MSC 7344, Bethesda, MD 20892-7344 (e-mail: potosky{at}nih.gov)
Background: Men treated for clinically localized prostate cancer with either radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy usually survive many years with the side effects of these treatments. We present treatment-specific quality-of-life outcomes for prostate cancer patients 5 years after initial diagnosis. Methods: The cohort consisted of men aged 5574 years who were newly diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer in 19941995 and were treated with radical prostatectomy (n = 901) or external beam radiotherapy (n = 286). We used clinical and quality-of-life data previously collected at the time of diagnosis (i.e., baseline) and at the 2-year follow-up and data newly collected at 5 years after diagnosis to compare urinary, bowel, and sexual function and to examine temporal changes in those functions. Odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted percentages were calculated by logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: At 5 years after diagnosis, overall sexual function declined in both groups to approximately the same level. However, at 5 years after diagnosis, erectile dysfunction was more prevalent in the radical prostatectomy group than in the external beam radiotherapy group (79.3% versus 63.5%; OR = 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6 to 3.8). Approximately 14%16% of radical prostatectomy and 4% of external beam radiotherapy patients were incontinent at 5 years (OR = 4.4, 95% CI = 2.2 to 8.6). Bowel urgency and painful hemorrhoids were more common in the external beam radiotherapy group than in the radical prostatectomy group. All of these differences remained statistically significant after adjustment for confounders and for differences between treatment groups in some baseline characteristics. Conclusions: At 5 years after diagnosis, men treated with radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer continue to experience worse urinary incontinence than men treated with external beam radiotherapy. However, the two treatment groups were more similar to each other with respect to overall sexual function, mostly because of a continuing decline in erectile function among the external beam radiotherapy patients between years 2 and 5.
Editorial about this Article
- Localized Prostate Cancer: Quality of Life Meets Whitmore's Legacy
- Carlos Bermejo, Alan R. Kristal, Steven B. Zeliadt, Scott Ramsey, and Ian M. Thompson
J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96: 1348-1349.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Related Memo to the Media
- Press Release: Study Looks At Quality of Life Five Years After Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
- Sarah L. Zielinski
J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96: 1347.[Extract] [Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. D. Michaelson, S. E. Cotter, P. C. Gargollo, A. L. Zietman, D. M. Dahl, and M. R. Smith Management of Complications of Prostate Cancer Treatment CA Cancer J Clin, July 1, 2008; 58(4): 196 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. W. D'Avolio, M. S. Litwin, S. O. Rogers Jr., and A. A.T. Bui Facilitating Clinical Outcomes Assessment through the Automated Identification of Quality Measures for Prostate Cancer Surgery J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2008; 15(3): 341 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Dale, A. Basu, A. Elstein, and D. Meltzer Predicting Utility Ratings for Joint Health States from Single Health States in Prostate Cancer: Empirical Testing of 3 Alternative Theories Med Decis Making, February 1, 2008; 28(1): 102 - 112. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Talcott Prostate Cancer Quality of Life: Beyond Initial Treatment and the Patient J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2007; 25(27): 4155 - 4156. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lipscomb, C. C. Gotay, and C. F. Snyder Patient-reported Outcomes in Cancer: A Review of Recent Research and Policy Initiatives CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2007; 57(5): 278 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Smith, R. Supramaniam, M. T. King, J. Ward, M. Berry, and B. K. Armstrong Age, Health, and Education Determine Supportive Care Needs of Men Younger Than 70 Years With Prostate Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2007; 25(18): 2560 - 2566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Litwin and D. C. Miller Treating Older Men With Prostate Cancer: Survival (or Selection) of the Fittest? JAMA, December 13, 2006; 296(22): 2733 - 2734. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Miller, S. B. Gruber, B. K. Hollenbeck, J. E. Montie, and J. T. Wei Incidence of initial local therapy among men with lower-risk prostate cancer in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst, August 16, 2006; 98(16): 1134 - 1141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Goldberg Being there is important, but getting there matters too: the role of path in the valuation process. Med Decis Making, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 323 - 337. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Edwards, M. L. Brown, P. A. Wingo, H. L. Howe, E. Ward, L. A. G. Ries, D. Schrag, P. M. Jamison, A. Jemal, X. C. Wu, et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2002, Featuring Population-Based Trends in Cancer Treatment J Natl Cancer Inst, October 5, 2005; 97(19): 1407 - 1427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. T. Eton, J.-S. Lai, D. Cella, B. B. Reeve, J. A. Talcott, J. A. Clark, C. P. McPherson, M. S. Litwin, and C. M. Moinpour Data Pooling and Analysis to Build a Preliminary Item Bank: An Example Using Bowel Function in Prostate Cancer Eval Health Prof, June 1, 2005; 28(2): 142 - 159. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Burnett Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy JAMA, June 1, 2005; 293(21): 2648 - 2653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Wientjes, J. H. Zheng, L. Hu, Y. Gan, and J. L-S. Au Intraprostatic Chemotherapy: Distribution and Transport Mechanisms Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 11(11): 4204 - 4211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bill-Axelson, L. Holmberg, M. Ruutu, M. Haggman, S.-O. Andersson, S. Bratell, A. Spangberg, C. Busch, S. Nordling, H. Garmo, et al. Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., May 12, 2005; 352(19): 1977 - 1984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Miller, M. G. Sanda, R. L. Dunn, J. E. Montie, H. Pimentel, H. M. Sandler, W. P. McLaughlin, and J. T. Wei Long-Term Outcomes Among Localized Prostate Cancer Survivors: Health-Related Quality-of-Life Changes After Radical Prostatectomy, External Radiation, and Brachytherapy J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2005; 23(12): 2772 - 2780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R. Schover Sexuality and Fertility after Cancer Hematology, January 1, 2005; 2005(1): 523 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Adverse Effects from Prostate Cancer Treatment Journal Watch (General), October 19, 2004; 2004(1019): 1 - 1. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bermejo, A. R. Kristal, S. B. Zeliadt, S. Ramsey, and I. M. Thompson Localized Prostate Cancer: Quality of Life Meets Whitmore's Legacy J Natl Cancer Inst, September 15, 2004; 96(18): 1348 - 1349. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||










