Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004 96(14):1076-1083; doi:10.1093/jnci/djh188
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, R. C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Crown, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, R. C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Crown, J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Memo to the Media
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Oxford University Press

ARTICLE

Conventional Adjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Single-Cycle, Autograft-Supported, High-Dose, Late-Intensification Chemotherapy in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Trial

Robert C. F. Leonard, Michael Lind, Christopher Twelves, Robert Coleman, Simon van Belle, Charles Wilson, Jonathan Ledermann, Ian Kennedy, Peter Barrett-Lee, Timothy Perren, Mark Verrill, David Cameron, Elizabeth Foster, Ann Yellowlees, John Crown
For the Anglo-Celtic Cooperative Oncology Group

Affiliations of authors: South West Wales Cancer Institute and University of Wales, Swansea (RCFL); Academic Department of Oncology, University of Hull, Hull, England (ML); Cancer Research UK Cancer Research Unit, University of Bradford, Bradford, England (CT); Weston Park Hospital and University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England (RC); University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium (SVB); Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, England (CW); University College, London, England (JL); Waikito Hospital, Waikito, New Zealand (IK); Velindre NHS Trust and Welsh School of Pharmacy, Cardiff, Wales (PBL); St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, England (TP); Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle upon Tyne, England (MV); Western General Hospital and Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, Scotland (DC); Scottish Cancer Therapy Network, Edinburgh (LF); Quantics Consulting Limited, Edinburgh (AY); St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland (JC)

Correspondence to: R. C. F. Leonard, MD, South West Wales Cancer Institute, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, Wales, U.K. SA2 8QA (e-mail: r.c.f.leonard{at}swan.ac.uk)

Background: Breast cancer patients with four or more positive axillary lymph nodes who are treated with conventional adjuvant therapy have a poor prognosis. In uncontrolled studies, high-dose chemotherapy produced much better results than conventional therapy. We compared the benefits of a single cycle of high-dose chemotherapy and the benefits of conventional chemotherapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer in a prospective, unblinded, randomized trial. Methods: Between February 23, 1995, and June 29, 1999, 605 patients with breast cancer who had four or more positive lymph nodes were randomly assigned to treatment (307 to high-dose therapy and 298 to conventional therapy). The conventional chemotherapy regimen was four cycles of doxorubicin (75 mg/m2) followed by eight cycles of CMF (cyclophosphamide [600 mg/m2], methotrexate [50 mg/m2], and 5-fluorouracil [600 mg/m2]), all given intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The high-dose regimen was four cycles of doxorubicin (75 mg/m2), followed by a single cycle of intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (4000 mg/m2) supported by filgrastim (300 µg/day) for up to 10 days followed by high-dose cyclophosphamide (6000 mg/m2) and thiotepa (800 mg/m2). Peripheral blood progenitor cells were harvested by leukapheresis after treatment with cyclophosphamide and filgrastim and then re-infused after the high-dose cycle. Log-rank tests were used to compare survival rates. All statistical analyses were two-sided. Results: At a median follow-up of 6 years, no statistically significant differences were detected between the arms in 5-year relapse-free survival (high-dose arm = 57%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 51% to 63%; conventional-dose arm = 54%, 95% CI = 48% to 61% (P = .73) or in 5-year overall survival (high-dose arm = 62%, 95% CI = 56% to 68%; conventional-dose arm = 64%, 95% CI = 57% to 70%) (P = .38). Conclusion: Autograft-supported, high-dose therapy is not superior to conventional chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer who have multiple involved lymph nodes. This conclusion should be viewed in the context of improving the success of conventional chemotherapy.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related Memo to the Media

Press Release: High-Dose Chemotherapy Not Superior to Conventional Chemotherapy in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients
Sarah L. Zielinski
J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96: 1047. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. R. Zander, C. Schmoor, N. Kroger, W. Kruger, V. Mobus, N. Frickhofen, B. Metzner, W. E. Berdel, M. Koenigsmann, E. Thiel, et al.
Randomized trial of high-dose adjuvant chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support versus standard-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes: overall survival after 6 years of follow-up
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2008; 19(6): 1082 - 1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
O. Gluz, U. A. Nitz, N. Harbeck, E. Ting, R. Kates, A. Herr, W. Lindemann, C. Jackisch, W. E. Berdel, H. Kirchner, et al.
Triple-negative high-risk breast cancer derives particular benefit from dose intensification of adjuvant chemotherapy: results of WSG AM-01 trial
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2008; 19(5): 861 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
Y. Nieto, F. Nawaz, R. B. Jones, E. J. Shpall, and S. Nawaz
Prognostic Significance of Overexpression and Phosphorylation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and the Presence of Truncated EGFRvIII in Locoregionally Advanced Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2007; 25(28): 4405 - 4413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
H. C.F. Moore, S. J. Green, J. R. Gralow, S. I. Bearman, D. Lew, W. E. Barlow, C. Hudis, A. C. Wolff, J. N. Ingle, H. K. Chew, et al.
Intensive Dose-Dense Compared With High-Dose Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Operable Breast Cancer: Southwest Oncology Group/Intergroup Study 9623
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2007; 25(13): 1677 - 1682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
N Wilking, E Lidbrink, T Wiklund, B Erikstein, H Lindman, P Malmstrom, P Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, N-O Bengtsson, G Soderlund, G Anker, et al.
Long-term follow-up of the SBG 9401 study comparing tailored FEC-based therapy versus marrow-supported high-dose therapy
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2007; 18(4): 694 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. J. Poole, H. M. Earl, L. Hiller, J. A. Dunn, S. Bathers, R. J. Grieve, D. A. Spooner, R. K. Agrawal, I. N. Fernando, A. M. Brunt, et al.
Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil as Adjuvant Therapy for Early Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., November 2, 2006; 355(18): 1851 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
International Breast Cancer Study Group
Multicycle Dose-Intensive Chemotherapy for Women With High-Risk Primary Breast Cancer: Results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 15-95
J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2006; 24(3): 370 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
R. C. Coombes, A. Howell, M. Emson, C. Peckitt, C. Gallagher, C. Bengala, A. Tres, R. Welch, P. Lawton, R. Rubens, et al.
High dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation as adjuvant therapy for primary breast cancer patients with four or more lymph nodes involved: long-term results of an international randomised trial
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2005; 16(5): 726 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.