Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004 96(11):844-852; doi:10.1093/jnci/djh163
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hatsukami, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hecht, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hatsukami, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hecht, S. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Oxford University Press

ARTICLE

Evaluation of Carcinogen Exposure in People Who Used "Reduced Exposure" Tobacco Products

Dorothy K. Hatsukami, Charlotte Lemmonds, Yan Zhang, Sharon E. Murphy, Chap Le, Steven G. Carmella, Stephen S. Hecht

Affiliation of authors: University of Minnesota Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Center and Cancer Center, Minneapolis

Correspondence to: Dorothy K. Hatsukami, PhD, Tobacco Use Research Center, University of Minnesota, 2701 University Ave., SE, #201, Minneapolis, MN 55414 (e-mail: hatsu001{at}umn.edu)

Background: Although tobacco products with reportedly reduced carcinogen content are being marketed, carcinogen uptake in people who use these products has not been assessed systematically. Methods: Between June 2001 and November 2002, 54 users of smokeless tobacco and 51 cigarette smokers were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One used test products (Swedish snus for users of smokeless tobacco or OMNI cigarettes for smokers), while the other quit and used medicinal nicotine (the nicotine patch). All participants were assessed for urinary levels of total NNAL [4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol and its glucuronide], metabolites of the tobacco-specific carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone. Smokers were also assessed for levels of 1-hydroxypyrene (1-HOP), a biomarker of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon uptake. Assessments were made weekly during 2 weeks of baseline normal tobacco use and 4 weeks of treatment. Statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Primary data analyses were conducted on 41 users of smokeless tobacco and 38 cigarette smokers who met the inclusion criteria. Total NNAL levels were statistically significantly lower in users of smokeless tobacco after they switched to snus or to nicotine patch (P<.001 for both groups) than they were before the switch, although the overall mean total NNAL level among subjects who used the nicotine patch was statistically significantly lower than that among those who used snus (mean = 1.2 and 2.0 pmol of NNAL/mg of creatinine, respectively; mean difference = 0.9 pmol of NNAL/mg of creatinine, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.2 to 1.5; P = .008). Compared with baseline levels, total NNAL levels (P = .003), but not 1-HOP levels, were statistically significantly reduced in cigarette smokers who switched to the OMNI cigarette, although both total NNAL levels and 1-HOP levels were statistically significantly reduced in smokers who switched to the nicotine patch (P<.001 for both). The overall mean total NNAL levels among smokers who used the nicotine patch was statistically significantly lower than that among smokers who used the OMNI cigarette (mean = 1.2 and 1.9 pmol of NNAL/mg of creatinine, respectively; mean difference = 0.6 pmol of NNAL/mg of creatinine, 95% CI = 0.1 to 1.1; P = .022).Conclusion: Switching to reduced-exposure tobacco products or medicinal nicotine can decrease levels of tobacco-associated carcinogens, with greater reductions being observed with medicinal nicotine. Medicinal nicotine is a safer alternative than modified tobacco products.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nicotine Tob ResHome page
T. B. Baker, K. M. Cummings, D. K. Hatsukami, C. A. Johnson, C. Lerman, R. Niaura, and S. S. O'Malley
Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Centers: Research achievements and future implications
Nicotine Tob Res, October 1, 2009; 11(10): 1231 - 1244.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M. Zeller, D. Hatsukami, and and the Strategic Dialogue on Tobacco Harm Reducti
The Strategic Dialogue on Tobacco Harm Reduction: a vision and blueprint for action in the US
Tob. Control, August 1, 2009; 18(4): 324 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
R J O'Connor and P J Hurley
Existing technologies to reduce specific toxicant emissions in cigarette smoke
Tob. Control, September 1, 2008; 17(Suppl_1): i39 - i48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. S. Hecht, S. G. Carmella, S. E. Murphy, W. T. Riley, C. Le, X. Luo, M. Mooney, and D. K. Hatsukami
Similar Exposure to a Tobacco-Specific Carcinogen in Smokeless Tobacco Users and Cigarette Smokers
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2007; 16(8): 1567 - 1572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of ToxicologyHome page
H.-J. Haussmann
Smoking and Lung Cancer: Future Research Directions
International Journal of Toxicology, July 1, 2007; 26(4): 353 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M. Kotlyar, M I. Mendoza-Baumgart, Z.-z. Li, P. R Pentel, B. C Barnett, R. M Feuer, E. A Smith, and D. K Hatsukami
Nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects of three potential reduced exposure products, moist snuff and nicotine lozenge
Tob. Control, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 138 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
K. H. Ginzel, G. S. Maritz, D. F. Marks, M. Neuberger, Jim. R. Pauly, J. R. Polito, R. Schulte-Hermann, and T. A. Slotkin
Critical Review: Nicotine for the Fetus, the Infant and the Adolescent?
J Health Psychol, March 1, 2007; 12(2): 215 - 224.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
D. A. Savitz, R. E. Meyer, J. M. Tanzer, S. S. Mirvish, and F. Lewin
Public Health Implications of Smokeless Tobacco Use as a Harm Reduction Strategy
Am J Public Health, November 1, 2006; 96(11): 1934 - 1939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
T Eissenberg
The time for tobacco industry sponsored PREP evaluation has arrived
Tob. Control, February 1, 2006; 15(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
A McNeill, R Bedi, S Islam, M N Alkhatib, and R West
Levels of toxins in oral tobacco products in the UK
Tob. Control, February 1, 2006; 15(1): 64 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
N. L. Benowitz, P. Jacob III, J. T. Bernert, M. Wilson, L. Wang, F. Allen, and D. Dempsey
Carcinogen Exposure during Short-term Switching from Regular to "Light" Cigarettes
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2005; 14(6): 1376 - 1383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
aacredbookHome page
S. S. Hecht
Tobacco Carcinogen Biomarkers: Old and New
Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book, April 1, 2005; 2005(1): 85 - 88.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. S. Hecht, S. E. Murphy, S. G. Carmella, S. Li, J. Jensen, C. Le, A. M. Joseph, and D. K. Hatsukami
Similar Uptake of Lung Carcinogens by Smokers of Regular, Light, and Ultralight Cigarettes
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2005; 14(3): 693 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. E. Murphy, C. A. Link, J. Jensen, C. Le, S. S. Puumala, S. S. Hecht, S. G. Carmella, L. Losey, and D. K. Hatsukami
A Comparison of Urinary Biomarkers of Tobacco and Carcinogen Exposure in Smokers
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2004; 13(10): 1617 - 1623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.