Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2003 95(24):1859-1868; doi:10.1093/jnci/djg120
© 2003 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doherty, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufmann, W. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doherty, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufmann, W. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2003 Oxford University Press

ARTICLE

Cell Cycle Checkpoint Function in Bladder Cancer

Sharon C. Doherty, Stephanie R. McKeown, Valerie McKelvey-Martin, C. Stephen Downes, Anthony Atala, James J. Yoo, Dennis A. Simpson, William K. Kaufmann

Affiliations of authors: Cancer and Ageing Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland (SCD, VMM, CSD); Radiation Science Research Group, School of Applied Medical Science and Sports Studies, University of Ulster, Jordanstown, Northern Ireland (SCD, SRM); Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Cellular Therapeutics, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (AA, JJY); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Center for Environmental Health and Susceptibility, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (DAS, WKK).

Correspondence to: William K. Kaufmann, PhD, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Center for Environmental Health and Susceptibility, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7295 (e-mail: bill_kaufmann{at}med.unc.edu)

Background: Cell cycle checkpoints function to maintain genetic stability by providing additional time for repair of DNA damage and completion of events that are necessary for accurate cell division. Some checkpoints, such as the DNA damage G1 checkpoint, are dependent on p53, whereas other checkpoints, such as the decatenation G2 checkpoint, are not. Because bladder transitional cell carcinomas (TCCs) often contain numerous chromosomal aberrations and appear to have highly unstable genomes, we analyzed cell cycle checkpoint functions in a panel of TCC lines. Methods: Cell cycle arrest was induced in normal human fibroblasts (NHF1-hTERT) and normal human uroepithelial cells (HUCs), and TCC lines and checkpoint functions were quantified using flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. The inducers and checkpoints were ionizing radiation (i.e., DNA damage) (G1 and G2 checkpoints), the mitotic inhibitor colcemid (polyploidy checkpoint), or the topoisomerase II catalytic inhibitor ICRF-193 (decatenation G2 checkpoint). Four of the five TCC lines expressed mutant p53. Results: HUCs had an effective G1 checkpoint response to ionizing radiation, with 68% of cells inhibited from moving from G1 into S phase. By contrast, G1 checkpoint function was severely attenuated (<15% inhibition) in three of the five TCC lines and moderately attenuated (<50% inhibition) in the other two lines. NHF1-hTERT had an effective polyploidy checkpoint response, but three of five TCC lines were defective in this checkpoint. HUCs had effective ionizing radiation and decatenation G2 checkpoint responses. All TCC lines had a relatively effective G2 checkpoint response to DNA damage, although the responses of two of the TCC lines were moderately attenuated relative to HUCs. All TCC lines had a severe defect in the decatenation G2 checkpoint response. Conclusion: Bladder TCC lines have defective cell cycle checkpoint functions, suggesting that the p53-independent decatenation G2 checkpoint may cooperate with the p53-dependent G1 checkpoints to preserve chromosomal stability and suppress bladder carcinogenesis.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Fan, J. Stanfield, Y. Guo, J. A. Karam, E. Frenkel, X. Sun, and J.-T. Hsieh
Effect of Trans-2,3-Dimethoxycinnamoyl Azide on Enhancing Antitumor Activity of Romidepsin on Human Bladder Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2008; 14(4): 1200 - 1207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L.-H. Yih, Y.-Y. Tseng, Y.-C. Wu, and T.-C. Lee
Induction of Centrosome Amplification during Arsenite-Induced Mitotic Arrest in CGL-2 Cells
Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 66(4): 2098 - 2106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
D. O. Cowley, G. W. Muse, and T. Van Dyke
A Dominant Interfering Bub1 Mutant Is Insufficient To Induce or Alter Thymic Tumorigenesis In Vivo, Even in a Sensitized Genetic Background
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2005; 25(17): 7796 - 7802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Koed, C. Wiuf, L.-L. Christensen, F. P. Wikman, K. Zieger, K. Moller, H. von der Maase, and T. F. Orntoft
High-Density Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Array Defines Novel Stage and Location-Dependent Allelic Imbalances in Human Bladder Tumors
Cancer Res., January 1, 2005; 65(1): 34 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. Nakagawa, Y. Hayashita, K. Maeno, A. Masuda, N. Sugito, H. Osada, K. Yanagisawa, H. Ebi, K. Shimokata, and T. Takahashi
Identification of Decatenation G2 Checkpoint Impairment Independently of DNA Damage G2 Checkpoint in Human Lung Cancer Cell Lines
Cancer Res., July 15, 2004; 64(14): 4826 - 4832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.