Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2003 95(1):30-37; doi:10.1093/jnci/95.1.30
© 2003 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greendale, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ursin, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greendale, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ursin, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 95, No. 1, 30-37, January 1, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press


ARTICLE

Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Change in Mammographic Density

Gail A. Greendale, Beth A. Reboussin, Stacey Slone, Carol Wasilauskas, Malcolm C. Pike, Giske Ursin

Affiliations of authors: G. A. Greendale, Division of Geriatric Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles; B. A. Reboussin, S. Slone, C. Wasilauskas, Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; M. C. Pike, G. Ursin, Department of Preventive Medicine/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Correspondence to: Gail A. Greendale, M.D., Division of Geriatrics, UCLA School of Medicine, 10945 Le Conte Ave., Ste. 2339, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1687 (e-mail: ggreenda{at}mednet.ucla.edu).

Background: Mammographic density is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Postmenopausal hormone use is associated with an increase in mammographic density, but the magnitude of the density increase is unknown. Methods: Baseline and 12-month mammograms were obtained for 571 (65%) of the 875 women, aged 45–64 years, who were enrolled in the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions Trial and randomly assigned to receive placebo, daily conjugated equine estrogens at 0.625 mg/day (CEE), daily CEE and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) at 10 mg/day on days 1–12 (CEE+MPA-cyclic), daily CEE and MPA at 2.5 mg/day (CEE+MPA-continuous), or daily CEE and micronized progesterone (MP) at 200 mg/day on days 1–12 (CEE+MP). We analyzed digitized mammograms to determine the percentage of the left breast that was composed of dense tissue (i.e., mammographic percent density). Linear regression analysis was used to examine the effects of treatments on the change in mammographic percent density between baseline and 12 months, before and after adjustment for possible confounders. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The adjusted absolute mean changes in mammographic percent density over 12 months were 4.76% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.29% to 6.23%), 4.58% (95% CI = 3.19% to 5.97%), and 3.08% (95% CI = 1.65% to 4.51%) for women in the CEE+MPA-cyclic, CEE+MPA-continuous, and CEE-MP groups, respectively. Each of those absolute mean changes was statistically significantly different from the adjusted absolute mean change in mammographic percent density for women in the placebo group, which was -0.07% (95% CI = -1.50% to 1.38%). Conclusion: Greater mammographic density was associated with the use of estrogen/progestin combination therapy, regardless of how the progestin was given, but not with the use of estrogen only.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. L. Prentice, R. T. Chlebowski, M. L. Stefanick, J. E. Manson, M. Pettinger, S. L. Hendrix, F. A. Hubbell, C. Kooperberg, L. H. Kuller, D. S. Lane, et al.
Estrogen Plus Progestin Therapy and Breast Cancer in Recently Postmenopausal Women
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2008; 167(10): 1207 - 1216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
K. Kerlikowske, D. S. M. Buist, R. Walker, and D. L. Miglioretti
Response: Re: Declines in Invasive Breast Cancer and Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy in a Screening Mammography Population
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 16, 2008; 100(8): 599 - 599.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. Kendall, H. Anderson, A. K. Dunbier, A. Mackay, T. Dexter, A. Urruticoechea, C. Harper-Wynne, and M. Dowsett
Impact of Estrogen Deprivation on Gene Expression Profiles of Normal Postmenopausal Breast Tissue In vivo
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 855 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
R. T. Chlebowski, G. Anderson, M. Pettinger, D. Lane, R. D. Langer, M. A. Gillian, B. W. Walsh, C. Chen, A. McTiernan, and for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators
Estrogen Plus Progestin and Breast Cancer Detection by Means of Mammography and Breast Biopsy
Arch Intern Med, February 25, 2008; 168(4): 370 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. Lee, C. A. Haiman, H. Ma, D. Van Den Berg, L. Bernstein, and G. Ursin
The Role of Established Breast Cancer Susceptibility Loci in Mammographic Density in Young Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 258 - 260.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. Nagata, T. Matsubara, T. Hara, H. Fujita, Y. Nagao, S. Yamamoto, C. Shibuya, Y. Kashiki, and H. Shimizu
Urinary 6-Sulfatoxymelatonin and Mammographic Density in Japanese Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2509 - 2512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
C. E. Wood, J. M. Hester, and J. M. Cline
Mammary Gland Development in Early Pubertal Female Macaques
Toxicol Pathol, October 1, 2007; 35(6): 793 - 803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. J. Fabian
Low-Dose Tamoxifen for Combination Hormone Replacement Therapy Users
J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2007; 25(27): 4162 - 4164.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
K. Kerlikowske, D. L. Miglioretti, D. S. M. Buist, R. Walker, and P. A. Carney
Declines in Invasive Breast Cancer and Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy in a Screening Mammography Population
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 5, 2007; 99(17): 1335 - 1339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. M. Tamimi, C. Byrne, G. A. Colditz, and S. E. Hankinson
Endogenous Hormone Levels, Mammographic Density, and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 1, 2007; 99(15): 1178 - 1187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. M. Vachon, V. S. Pankratz, C. G. Scott, S. D. Maloney, K. Ghosh, K. R. Brandt, T. Milanese, M. J. Carston, and T. A. Sellers
Longitudinal Trends in Mammographic Percent Density and Breast Cancer Risk
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 921 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. W. Reeves, G. L. Gierach, and F. Modugno
Recreational Physical Activity and Mammographic Breast Density Characteristics
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 934 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
F. J.B. van Duijnhoven, P. H.M. Peeters, R. M.L. Warren, S. A. Bingham, P. A.H. van Noord, E. M. Monninkhof, D. E. Grobbee, and C. H. van Gils
Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Changes in Mammographic Density
J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2007; 25(11): 1323 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
K. Kerlikowske, L. Ichikawa, D. L. Miglioretti, D. S. M. Buist, P. M. Vacek, R. Smith-Bindman, B. Yankaskas, P. A. Carney, and R. Ballard-Barbash
Longitudinal Measurement of Clinical Mammographic Breast Density to Improve Estimation of Breast Cancer Risk
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 7, 2007; 99(5): 386 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. E. Olson, C. X. Ma, L. L. Pelleymounter, D. J. Schaid, V. S. Pankratz, R. A. Vierkant, Z. S. Fredericksen, J. N. Ingle, Y. Wu, F. Couch, et al.
A Comprehensive Examination of CYP19 Variation and Breast Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2007; 16(3): 623 - 625.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. N. Weitzel, S. S. Buys, W. H. Sherman, A. M. Daniels, G. Ursin, J. R. Daniels, D. J. MacDonald, K. R. Blazer, M. C. Pike, and D. V. Spicer
Reduced Mammographic Density with Use of a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist-Based Chemoprevention Regimen in BRCA1 Carriers
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 13(2): 654 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. M. Vachon, K. R. Brandt, K. Ghosh, C. G. Scott, S. D. Maloney, M. J. Carston, V. S. Pankratz, and T. A. Sellers
Mammographic Breast Density as a General Marker of Breast Cancer Risk
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
N. F. Boyd, L. J. Martin, L. Sun, H. Guo, A. Chiarelli, G. Hislop, M. Yaffe, and S. Minkin
Body Size, Mammographic Density, and Breast Cancer Risk.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2086 - 2092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. M. Chiarelli, V. A. Kirsh, N. S. Klar, R. Shumak, R. Jong, E. Fishell, M. J. Yaffe, and N. F. Boyd
Influence of patterns of hormone replacement therapy use and mammographic density on breast cancer detection.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2006; 15(10): 1856 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. Messina, W. McCaskill-Stevens, and J. W. Lampe
Addressing the soy and breast cancer relationship: review, commentary, and workshop proceedings.
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 20, 2006; 98(18): 1275 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. Ursin and M. Pike
Mammographic density, hormone therapy, and risk of breast cancer.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2006; 15(9): 1750 - 1750.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. J. Crandall, A. Karlamangla, M.-H. Huang, G. Ursin, M. Guan, and G. A. Greendale
Association of New-Onset Breast Discomfort With an Increase in Mammographic Density During Hormone Therapy
Arch Intern Med, August 14, 2006; 166(15): 1578 - 1584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. Warren, J. Skinner, E. Sala, E. Denton, M. Dowsett, E. Folkerd, C. S. Healey, A. Dunning, D. Doody, B. Ponder, et al.
Associations among Mammographic Density, Circulating Sex Hormones, and Polymorphisms in Sex Hormone Metabolism Genes in Postmenopausal Women.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2006; 15(8): 1502 - 1508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. R. Palomares, J. R.B. Machia, C. D. Lehman, J. R. Daling, and A. McTiernan
Mammographic density correlation with gail model breast cancer risk estimates and component risk factors.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2006; 15(7): 1324 - 1330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
N. F. Boyd, L. J. Martin, Q. Li, L. Sun, A. M. Chiarelli, G. Hislop, M. J. Yaffe, and S. Minkin
Mammographic density as a surrogate marker for the effects of hormone therapy on risk of breast cancer.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2006; 15(5): 961 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. Maskarinec, I. Pagano, G. Lurie, and L. N. Kolonel
A longitudinal investigation of mammographic density: the multiethnic cohort.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2006; 15(4): 732 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
F. J.B. van Duijnhoven, P. H.M. Peeters, R. M.L. Warren, S. A. Bingham, A. G. Uitterlinden, P. A.H. van Noord, E. M. Monninkhof, D. E. Grobbee, and C. H. van Gils
Influence of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} and Progesterone Receptor Polymorphisms on the Effects of Hormone Therapy on Mammographic Density.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2006; 15(3): 462 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. Haars, P. A.H. van Noord, C. H. van Gils, D. E. Grobbee, and P. H.M. Peeters
Measurements of Breast Density: No Ratio for a Ratio
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2005; 14(11): 2634 - 2640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. M. Tamimi, S. E. Hankinson, G. A. Colditz, and C. Byrne
Endogenous Sex Hormone Levels and Mammographic Density among Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2005; 14(11): 2641 - 2647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
J. J. Fenton, M. B. Barton, A. M. Geiger, L. J. Herrinton, S. J. Rolnick, E. L. Harris, W. E. Barlow, L. M. Reisch, S. W. Fletcher, and J. G. Elmore
Screening Clinical Breast Examination: How Often Does It Miss Lethal Breast Cancer?
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, November 1, 2005; 2005(35): 67 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
G. A. Greendale, S. L. Palla, G. Ursin, G. A. Laughlin, C. Crandall, M. C. Pike, and B. A. Reboussin
The Association of Endogenous Sex Steroids and Sex Steroid Binding Proteins with Mammographic Density: Results from the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions Mammographic Density Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2005; 162(9): 826 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
G. Maskarinec, I. Pagano, G. Lurie, L. R. Wilkens, and L. N. Kolonel
Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk: The Multiethnic Cohort Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 15, 2005; 162(8): 743 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. McTiernan, C. F. Martin, J. D. Peck, A. K. Aragaki, R. T. Chlebowski, E. D. Pisano, C. Y. Wang, R. L. Brunner, K. C. Johnson, J. E. Manson, et al.
Estrogen-Plus-Progestin Use and Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women: Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 21, 2005; 97(18): 1366 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. Stuedal, I. T. Gram, Y. Bremnes, H. Adlercreutz, M. B. Veierod, and G. Ursin
Plasma Levels of Enterolactone and Percentage Mammographic Density among Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2005; 14(9): 2154 - 2159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. S. Dite, J. D. Wark, G. G. Giles, D. R. English, M. R.E. McCredie, and J. L. Hopper
Is There Overlap Between the Genetic Determinants of Mammographic Density and Bone Mineral Density?
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2005; 14(9): 2266 - 2268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Berube, C. Diorio, B. Masse, N. Hebert-Croteau, C. Byrne, G. Cote, M. Pollak, M. Yaffe, and J. Brisson
Vitamin D and Calcium Intakes from Food or Supplements and Mammographic Breast Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2005; 14(7): 1653 - 1659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. R. Cerhan, T. A. Sellers, C. A. Janney, V. S. Pankratz, K. R. Brandt, and C. M. Vachon
Prenatal and Perinatal Correlates of Adult Mammographic Breast Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2005; 14(6): 1502 - 1508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
K. Kerlikowske, J. Shepherd, J. Creasman, J. A. Tice, E. Ziv, and S. R. Cummings
Are Breast Density and Bone Mineral Density Independent Risk Factors for Breast Cancer?
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 2, 2005; 97(5): 368 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A.-S. Furberg, G. Jasienska, N. Bjurstam, P. A. Torjesen, A. Emaus, S. F. Lipson, P. T. Ellison, and I. Thune
Metabolic and Hormonal Profiles: HDL Cholesterol as a Plausible Biomarker of Breast Cancer Risk. The Norwegian EBBA Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 33 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. Ziv, J. Tice, R. Smith-Bindman, J. Shepherd, S. Cummings, and K. Kerlikowske
Mammographic Density and Estrogen Receptor Status of Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2004; 13(12): 2090 - 2095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
G. Maskarinec, Y. Takata, A. A. Franke, A. E. Williams, and S. P. Murphy
A 2-Year Soy Intervention in Premenopausal Women Does Not Change Mammographic Densities
J. Nutr., November 1, 2004; 134(11): 3089 - 3094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
C. J. Fabian, B. F. Kimler, and M. S. Mayo
Ductal Lavage for Early Detection--What Doesn't Come Out in the Wash
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 20, 2004; 96(20): 1488 - 1489.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
L. A. Habel, J. J. Dignam, S. R. Land, M. Salane, A. M. Capra, and T. B. Julian
Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer After Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 6, 2004; 96(19): 1467 - 1472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. Ursin, S. L. Palla, B. A. Reboussin, S. Slone, C. Wasilauskas, M. C. Pike, and G. A. Greendale
Post-Treatment Change in Serum Estrone Predicts Mammographic Percent Density Changes in Women Who Received Combination Estrogen and Progestin in the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., July 15, 2004; 22(14): 2842 - 2848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. L. Frankenfeld, A. McTiernan, E. J. Aiello, W. K. Thomas, K. LaCroix, J. Schramm, S. M. Schwartz, V. L. Holt, and J. W. Lampe
Mammographic Density in Relation to Daidzein-Metabolizing Phenotypes in Overweight, Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2004; 13(7): 1156 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Hormones and breast cancer
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2004; 10(4): 281 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Decensi, B. Bonanni, L. Baglietto, A. Guerrieri-Gonzaga, F. Ramazzotto, H. Johansson, C. Robertson, I. Marinucci, F. Mariette, M. T. Sandri, et al.
A Two-by-Two Factorial Trial Comparing Oral with Transdermal Estrogen Therapy and Fenretinide with Placebo on Breast Cancer Biomarkers
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2004; 10(13): 4389 - 4397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. Cuzick, J. Warwick, E. Pinney, R. M. L. Warren, and S. W. Duffy
Tamoxifen and Breast Density in Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 21, 2004; 96(8): 621 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. O. Lillie, L. Bernstein, S. A. Ingles, W. J. Gauderman, G. E. Rivas, V. Gagalang, T. Krontiris, and G. Ursin
Polymorphism in the Androgen Receptor and Mammographic Density in Women Taking and Not Taking Estrogen and Progestin Therapy
Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 64(4): 1237 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
K. Kerlikowske, D. L. Miglioretti, R. Ballard-Barbash, D. L. Weaver, D. S.M. Buist, W. E. Barlow, G. Cutter, B. M. Geller, B. Yankaskas, S. H. Taplin, et al.
Prognostic Characteristics of Breast Cancer Among Postmenopausal Hormone Users in a Screened Population
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2003; 21(23): 4314 - 4321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.