© 2002 by Oxford University Press
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 94, No. 20, 1546-1554,
October 16, 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press
ARTICLE |
Detection of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Women Undergoing Screening Mammography
Affiliations of authors: V. L. Ernster, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco; R. Ballard-Barbash, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; W. E. Barlow, Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA, and Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle; Y. Zheng, Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington; D. L. Weaver, (Department of Pathology), B. M. Geller (Health Promotion Research), University of Vermont, College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; G. Cutter, Center for Research Design and Statistical Methods, University of Nevada, Reno; B. C. Yankaskas, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; R. Rosenberg, Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque; P. A. Carney, Norris Cotton Cancer Center/Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center/Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH; K. Kerlikowske, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, and General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of California, San Francisco; S. H. Taplin, Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle; N. Urban, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health, Seattle.
Correspondence to: Rachel Ballard-Barbash, M.D., M.P.H., Applied Research Program, National Cancer Institute, EPN 4005, 6130 Executive Blvd., MSC 7344, Bethesda, MD 20892-7344 (e-mail: barbashr{at}mail.nih.gov).
Background: With the large number of women having mammography—an estimated 28.4 million U.S. women aged 40 years and older in 1998—the percentage of cancers detected as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), which has an uncertain prognosis, has increased. We pooled data from seven regional mammography registries to determine the percentage of mammographically detected cancers that are DCIS and the rate of DCIS per 1000 mammograms. Methods: We analyzed data on 653 833 mammograms from 540 738 women between 40 and 84 years of age who underwent screening mammography at facilities participating in the National Cancer Institute’s Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) throughout 1996 and 1997. Mammography results were linked to population-based cancer and pathology registries. We calculated the percentage of screen-detected breast cancers that were DCIS, the rate of screen-detected DCIS per 1000 mammograms by age and by previous mammography status, and the sensitivity of screening mammography. Statistical tests were two-sided. Results: A total of 3266 cases of breast cancer were identified, 591 DCIS and 2675 invasive breast cancer. The percentage of screen-detected breast cancers that were DCIS decreased with age (from 28.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 23.9% to 32.5%] for women aged 40–49 years to 16.0% [95% CI = 13.3% to 18.7%] for women aged 70–84 years). However, the rate of screen-detected DCIS cases per 1000 mammograms increased with age (from 0.56 [95% CI = 0.41 to 0.70] for women aged 40–49 years to 1.07 [95% CI = 0.87 to 1.27] for women aged 70–84 years). Sensitivity of screening mammography in all age groups combined was higher for detecting DCIS (86.0% [95% CI = 83.2% to 88.8%]) than it was for detecting invasive breast cancer (75.1% [95% CI = 73.5% to 76.8%]). Conclusions: Overall, approximately 1 in every 1300 screening mammography examinations leads to a diagnosis of DCIS. Given uncertainty about the natural history of DCIS, the clinical significance of screen-detected DCIS needs further investigation.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Taplin, L. Abraham, W. E. Barlow, J. J. Fenton, E. A. Berns, P. A. Carney, G. R. Cutter, E. A. Sickles, D. Carl, and J. G. Elmore Mammography Facility Characteristics Associated With Interpretive Accuracy of Screening Mammography J Natl Cancer Inst, June 18, 2008; 100(12): 876 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Meijnen, H. S. A. Oldenburg, J. L. Peterse, H. Bartelink, and E. J. Th. Rutgers Clinical Outcome after Selective Treatment of Patients Diagnosed with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 235 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Dawood, K. Broglio, A. M. Gonzalez-Angulo, S.-W. Kau, W. Yang, C. Albarracin, F. Meric, G. Hortobagyi, and R. Theriault Development of New Cancers in Patients with DCIS: The M.D. Anderson Experience Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 244 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. L. Miglioretti, R. Smith-Bindman, L. Abraham, R. J. Brenner, P. A. Carney, E. J. A. Bowles, D. S. M. Buist, and J. G. Elmore Radiologist Characteristics Associated With Interpretive Performance of Diagnostic Mammography J Natl Cancer Inst, December 19, 2007; 99(24): 1854 - 1863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Rakovitch, J.-P. Pignol, W. Hanna, S. Narod, J. Spayne, S. Nofech-Mozes, C. Chartier, and L. Paszat Significance of Multifocality in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Outcomes of Women Treated With Breast-Conserving Therapy J. Clin. Oncol., December 10, 2007; 25(35): 5591 - 5596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. S. Hwang, D. L. Miglioretti, R. Ballard-Barbash, D. L. Weaver, K. Kerlikowske, and for the National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Su Association between Breast Density and Subsequent Breast Cancer Following Treatment for Ductal Carcinoma In situ Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2007; 16(12): 2587 - 2593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. F. Anderson, A. S. Reiner, R. K. Matsuno, and R. M. Pfeiffer Shifting Breast Cancer Trends in the United States J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3923 - 3929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. de Roos, B. van der Vegt, J. de Vries, J. Wesseling, and G. H. de Bock Pathological and Biological Differences Between Screen-Detected and Interval Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast Ann. Surg. Oncol., July 1, 2007; 14(7): 2097 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Jiang, D. L. Miglioretti, C. E. Metz, and R. A. Schmidt Breast Cancer Detection Rate: Designing Imaging Trials to Demonstrate Improvements Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 360 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. J. Fenton, S. H. Taplin, P. A. Carney, L. Abraham, E. A. Sickles, C. D'Orsi, E. A. Berns, G. Cutter, R. E. Hendrick, W. E. Barlow, et al. Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography N. Engl. J. Med., April 5, 2007; 356(14): 1399 - 1409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Armstrong, E. Moye, S. Williams, J. A. Berlin, and E. E. Reynolds Screening Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 516 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. C. Tan, D. R. McCready, A. M. Easson, and W. L. Leong Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Ductal Carcinoma-in-situ Treated by Mastectomy Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 638 - 645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. A. Carney, L. A. Abraham, D. L. Miglioretti, K. R. Yabroff, E. A. Sickles, D. S. M. Buist, C. J. Kasales, B. M. Geller, R. D. Rosenberg, M. B. Dignan, et al. Factors Associated with Imaging and Procedural Events Used to Detect Breast Cancer After Screening Mammography Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 385 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Bijker, P. Meijnen, J. L. Peterse, J. Bogaerts, I. Van Hoorebeeck, J.-P. Julien, M. Gennaro, P. Rouanet, A. Avril, I. S. Fentiman, et al. Breast-Conserving Treatment With or Without Radiotherapy in Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ: Ten-Year Results of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Randomized Phase III Trial 10853--A Study by the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2006; 24(21): 3381 - 3387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M F Dillon, C M Quinn, E W McDermott, A O'Doherty, N O'Higgins, and A D K Hill Diagnostic accuracy of core biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ and its implications for surgical practice. J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2006; 59(7): 740 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Nekhlyudov, C. H. Kroenke, I. Jung, M. D. Holmes, and G. A. Colditz Prospective Changes in Quality of Life After Ductal Carcinoma-in-Situ: Results From the Nurses' Health Study J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2006; 24(18): 2822 - 2827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Smith-Bindman, D. L. Miglioretti, N. Lurie, L. Abraham, R. B. Barbash, J. Strzelczyk, M. Dignan, W. E. Barlow, C. M. Beasley, and K. Kerlikowske Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer? Ann Intern Med, April 18, 2006; 144(8): 541 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. K. Edwards, M. L. Brown, P. A. Wingo, H. L. Howe, E. Ward, L. A. G. Ries, D. Schrag, P. M. Jamison, A. Jemal, X. C. Wu, et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2002, Featuring Population-Based Trends in Cancer Treatment J Natl Cancer Inst, October 5, 2005; 97(19): 1407 - 1427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Arpino, R. Laucirica, and R. M. Elledge Premalignant and In Situ Breast Disease: Biology and Clinical Implications Ann Intern Med, September 20, 2005; 143(6): 446 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Kerlikowske, J. Creasman, J. W. T. Leung, R. Smith-Bindman, and V. L. Ernster Differences in Screening Mammography Outcomes Among White, Chinese, and Filipino Women Arch Intern Med, September 12, 2005; 165(16): 1862 - 1868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Hayman, M. U. Kabeto, M. J. Schipper, J. E. Bennett, F. A. Vicini, and L. J. Pierce Assessing the Benefit of Radiation Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2005; 23(22): 5171 - 5177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. G. Elmore, S. H. Taplin, W. E. Barlow, G. R. Cutter, C. J. D'Orsi, R. E. Hendrick, L. A. Abraham, J. S. Fosse, and P. A. Carney Does Litigation Influence Medical Practice? The Influence of Community Radiologists' Medical Malpractice Perceptions and Experience on Screening Mammography Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 37 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. R. Aberle, C. Chiles, C. Gatsonis, B. J. Hillman, C. D. Johnson, B. L. McClennan, D. G. Mitchell, E. D. Pisano, M. D. Schnall, and A. G. Sorensen Imaging and Cancer: Research Strategy of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 741 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Heath Who needs health care--the well or the sick? BMJ, April 23, 2005; 330(7497): 954 - 956. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Barratt, K. Howard, L. Irwig, G. Salkeld, and N. Houssami Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices BMJ, April 23, 2005; 330(7497): 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Smith-Bindman, P. Chu, D. L. Miglioretti, C. Quale, R. D. Rosenberg, G. Cutter, B. Geller, P. Bacchetti, E. A. Sickles, and K. Kerlikowske Physician Predictors of Mammographic Accuracy J Natl Cancer Inst, March 2, 2005; 97(5): 358 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Kerlikowske, J. Shepherd, J. Creasman, J. A. Tice, E. Ziv, and S. R. Cummings Are Breast Density and Bone Mineral Density Independent Risk Factors for Breast Cancer? J Natl Cancer Inst, March 2, 2005; 97(5): 368 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Kerlikowske, R. Smith-Bindman, L. A. Abraham, C. D. Lehman, B. C. Yankaskas, R. Ballard-Barbash, W. E. Barlow, J. H. Voeks, B. M. Geller, P. A. Carney, et al. Breast Cancer Yield for Screening Mammographic Examinations with Recommendation for Short-Interval Follow-up Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 684 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. C. Yankaskas, S. H. Taplin, L. Ichikawa, B. M. Geller, R. D. Rosenberg, P. A. Carney, K. Kerlikowske, R. Ballard-Barbash, G. R. Cutter, and W. E. Barlow Association between Mammography Timing and Measures of Screening Performance in the United States Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 363 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. White, D. L. Miglioretti, B. C. Yankaskas, B. M. Geller, R. D. Rosenberg, K. Kerlikowske, L. Saba, P. M. Vacek, P. A. Carney, D. S. M. Buist, et al. Biennial Versus Annual Mammography and the Risk of Late-Stage Breast Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, December 15, 2004; 96(24): 1832 - 1839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Erbas, A. Amos, A. Fletcher, A. M. Kavanagh, and D. M. Gertig Incidence of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In situ in a Screening Program by Age: Should Older Women Continue Screening? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2004; 13(10): 1569 - 1573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Barratt, L. Trevena, H. M Davey, and K. McCaffery Use of decision aids to support informed choices about screening BMJ, August 28, 2004; 329(7464): 507 - 510. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. D. Leonard and S. M. Swain Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Complexities and Challenges J Natl Cancer Inst, June 16, 2004; 96(12): 906 - 920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. G. Elmore, P. A. Carney, L. A. Abraham, W. E. Barlow, J. R. Egger, J. S. Fosse, G. R. Cutter, R. E. Hendrick, C. J. D'Orsi, P. Paliwal, et al. The Association Between Obesity and Screening Mammography Accuracy Arch Intern Med, May 24, 2004; 164(10): 1140 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. J. Burstein, K. Polyak, J. S. Wong, S. C. Lester, and C. M. Kaelin Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast N. Engl. J. Med., April 1, 2004; 350(14): 1430 - 1441. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. N. Baxter, B. A. Virnig, S. B. Durham, and T. M. Tuttle Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast J Natl Cancer Inst, March 17, 2004; 96(6): 443 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. L. Miglioretti, C. M. Rutter, B. M. Geller, G. Cutter, W. E. Barlow, R. Rosenberg, D. L. Weaver, S. H. Taplin, R. Ballard-Barbash, P. A. Carney, et al. Effect of Breast Augmentation on the Accuracy of Mammography and Cancer Characteristics JAMA, January 28, 2004; 291(4): 442 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Kerlikowske, A. Molinaro, I. Cha, B.-M. Ljung, V. L. Ernster, K. Stewart, K. Chew, D. H. Moore II, and F. Waldman Characteristics Associated With Recurrence Among Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treated by Lumpectomy J Natl Cancer Inst, November 19, 2003; 95(22): 1692 - 1702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. A. Smith, D. Saslow, K. Andrews Sawyer, W. Burke, M. E. Costanza, W. P. Evans III, R. S. Foster Jr., E. Hendrick, H. J. Eyre, and S. Sener American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Update 2003 CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2003; 53(3): 141 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Berlin Breast Cancer, Mammography, and Malpractice Litigation: The Controversies Continue Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1229 - 1237. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. B. Kopans Re: Detection of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Women Undergoing Screening Mammography J Natl Cancer Inst, March 19, 2003; 95(6): 487 - 487. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|