Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2001 93(24):1864-1871; doi:10.1093/jnci/93.24.1864
© 2001 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harlan, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Stephenson, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harlan, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Stephenson, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 93, No. 24, 1864-1871, December 19, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


REPORT

Factors Associated With Initial Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study

Linda C. Harlan, Arnold Potosky, Frank D. Gilliland, Richard Hoffman, Peter C. Albertsen, Ann S. Hamilton, J. W. Eley, Janet L. Stanford, Robert A. Stephenson

Affiliations of authors: L. C. Harlan, A. Potosky, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; F. D. Gilliland, A. S. Hamilton, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; R. Hoffman, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and New Mexico Tumor Registry, Albuquerque; P. C. Albertsen, University of Connecticut Health Center, Framington; J. W. Eley, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; J. L. Stanford, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; R. A. Stephenson, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

Correspondence to: Linda C. Harlan, Ph.D., M.P.H., National Institutes of Health, Executive Plaza North, Suite 4005, 6130 Executive Blvd., MSC 7344, Bethesda, MD 20892 (e-mail: lh50w{at}nih.gov).

Background: Because of the lack of results from randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy of aggressive therapies with that of more conservative therapies for clinically localized prostate cancer, men and their physicians may select treatments based on other criteria. We examined the association of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with four management options: radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, and watchful waiting. Methods: We studied 3073 participants of the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study diagnosed from October 1, 1994, through October 31, 1995, with clinically localized disease (T1 or T2). Participants completed a baseline survey, and diagnostic and treatment information was abstracted from medical records. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with initial treatment. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Patients with clinically localized disease received the following treatments: radical prostatectomy (47.6%), radiation therapy (23.4%), hormonal therapy (10.5%), or watchful waiting (18.5%). Men aged 75 years or older more often received conservative treatment (i.e., hormonal therapy alone or watchful waiting; 57.9% of men aged 75–79 years and 82.1% of men aged 80 years and older) than aggressive treatment (i.e., radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy) (for all age groups, P<=.001). After adjustment for age, clinical stage, baseline prostate-specific antigen level, and histologic grade, the following factors were associated with conservative treatment: history of a heart attack, being unmarried, geographic region, poor pretreatment bladder control, and impotence. In men younger than 60 years, use of aggressive treatment was similar by race/ethnicity (adjusted percentages = 85.5%, 88.1%, and 85.3% for white, African-American, and Hispanic men, respectively). However, among men 60 years old and older, African-American men underwent aggressive treatment less often than did white men or Hispanic men (adjusted percentages for men aged 60–64 years = 67.1%, 84.7%, and 79.2%, respectively; 65–74 years = 64.8%, 73.4%, and 79.5%, respectively; and 75 years old and older = 25.2%, 45.7%, and 36.6%, respectively). Conclusions: The association of nonclinical factors with treatment suggests that, in the absence of definitive information regarding treatment effectiveness, men diagnosed with prostate cancer should be better informed of the risks and benefits of all treatment options.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Walz, A. Gallina, F. Saad, F. Montorsi, P. Perrotte, S. F. Shariat, C. Jeldres, M. Graefen, F. Benard, M. McCormack, et al.
A Nomogram Predicting 10-Year Life Expectancy in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2007; 25(24): 3576 - 3581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. B. Chen, A. V. D'Amico, B. A. Neville, and C. C. Earle
Patient and Treatment Factors Associated With Complications After Prostate Brachytherapy
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2006; 24(33): 5298 - 5304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. R. Cooperberg, J. W. Moul, and P. R. Carroll
The Changing Face of Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2005; 23(32): 8146 - 8151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. F. Penson
Variations in Prostate Cancer Patterns of Care: Is It the Quality of Care or the Quality of the Data?
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2005; 23(31): 7783 - 7784.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
B. K. Edwards, M. L. Brown, P. A. Wingo, H. L. Howe, E. Ward, L. A. G. Ries, D. Schrag, P. M. Jamison, A. Jemal, X. C. Wu, et al.
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2002, Featuring Population-Based Trends in Cancer Treatment
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 5, 2005; 97(19): 1407 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
V. B. Shahinian, Y.-F. Kuo, J. L. Freeman, and J. S. Goodwin
Risk of Fracture after Androgen Deprivation for Prostate Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., January 13, 2005; 352(2): 154 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Patel, P. J. Whelan, S. Prescott, S. C. Brownhill, C. F. Johnston, P. J. Selby, and S. A. Burchill
The Use of Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR for Prostate-Specific Antigen mRNA to Discriminate between Blood Samples from Healthy Volunteers and from Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2004; 10(22): 7511 - 7519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. R. Cooperberg, D. P. Lubeck, M. V. Meng, S. S. Mehta, and P. R. Carroll
The Changing Face of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Trends in Clinical Presentation and Primary Management
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2004; 22(11): 2141 - 2149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.