Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2000 92(8):602-612; doi:10.1093/jnci/92.8.602
© 2000 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perera, F. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perera, F. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 92, No. 8, 602-612, April 19, 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press


REVIEW

Molecular Epidemiology: On the Path to Prevention?

Frederica P. Perera

Correspondence to: Frederica P. Perera, Dr.P.H., Division of Environmental Health Sciences, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University, New York, NY 10032 (e-mail: FPP1{at}columbia.edu).

Cancer prevention has been the stated goal of molecular cancer epidemiology for the past 17 years. In this review, progress toward that goal is evaluated by using as examples well-studied environmental exposures—i.e., tobacco smoke, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, aflatoxin B1, benzene, and hepatitis B virus—and their roles in lung, breast, and liver cancers and leukemia. The contributions of molecular epidemiology discussed here include providing evidence that environmental agents pose carcinogenic risks, helping establish the causal roles of environmental factors in cancer, identifying environment–susceptibility interactions and populations at greatest risk, and developing new intervention strategies. Molecular epidemiologic and other data indicate that assessment of carcinogenic risks should address both the range of risk across the population and the risk to subgroups who may be at high risk because of genetic or acquired susceptibilities, including young children. However, for the most part, research results have not yet been effectively translated into risk assessments and preventive health policies. An infrastructure linking scientists, policy makers, and other constituencies is needed to facilitate this process. To extend our knowledge, the second generation of molecular epidemiologic research should include large-scale, collaborative studies incorporating validated biomarkers and automated technologies. An incentive to make the necessary investment is the recognition that prevention of only 20% of cancer in the United States would result in 200000 fewer new cases diagnosed each year and an annual savings of $21.4 billion in direct costs alone.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. Vineis and F. Perera
Molecular Epidemiology and Biomarkers in Etiologic Cancer Research: The New in Light of the Old
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2007; 16(10): 1954 - 1965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
P. Boffetta
Molecular cancer epidemiology: a tale of >3842 publications
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2007; 28(8): 1621 - 1621.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
F. PERERA, S. VISWANATHAN, R. WHYATT, D. TANG, R. L MILLER, and V. RAUH
Children's Environmental Health Research--Highlights from the Columbia Center for Children's Environmental Health.
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., September 1, 2006; 1076: 15 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
K. P. Tercyak and V. L. Tyc
Opportunities and Challenges in the Prevention and Control of Cancer and Other Chronic Diseases: Children's Diet and Nutrition and Weight and Physical Activity
J. Pediatr. Psychol., September 1, 2006; 31(8): 750 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. W. Thurston, G. Liu, D. P. Miller, and D. C. Christiani
Modeling Lung Cancer Risk in Case-Control Studies Using a New Dose Metric of Smoking
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2005; 14(10): 2296 - 2302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
R. P. Ojha and R. Thertulien
Health Care Policy Issues as a Result of the Genetic Revolution: Implications for Public Health
Am J Public Health, March 1, 2005; 95(3): 385 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
F. Perera, D. Tang, R. Whyatt, S. A. Lederman, and W. Jedrychowski
DNA Damage from Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Measured by Benzo[a]pyrene-DNA Adducts in Mothers and Newborns from Northern Manhattan, The World Trade Center Area, Poland, and China
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2005; 14(3): 709 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. A. Bocskay, D. Tang, M. A. Orjuela, X. Liu, D. P. Warburton, and F. P. Perera
Chromosomal Aberrations in Cord Blood Are Associated with Prenatal Exposure to Carcinogenic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2005; 14(2): 506 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. F. Okcu, M. Selvan, L.-E Wang, L. Stout, R. Erana, G. Airewele, P. Adatto, K. Hess, F. Ali-Osman, M. Groves, et al.
Glutathione S-Transferase Polymorphisms and Survival in Primary Malignant Glioma
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2004; 10(8): 2618 - 2625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
H. W. Mohrenweiser
Genetic Variation and Exposure Related Risk Estimation: Will Toxicology Enter a New Era? DNA Repair and Cancer as a Paradigm
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2004; 32(1_suppl): 136 - 145.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. E. Swan, K. S. Hudmon, L. M. Jack, K. Hemberger, D. Carmelli, T. V. Khroyan, H. Z. Ring, H. Hops, J. A. Andrews, E. Tildesley, et al.
Environmental and Genetic Determinants of Tobacco Use: Methodology for a Multidisciplinary, Longitudinal Family-Based Investigation
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2003; 12(10): 994 - 1005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
P. E. Jackson, P. J. O'Connor, D. P. Cooper, G. P. Margison, and A. C. Povey
Associations between tissue-specific DNA alkylation, DNA repair and cell proliferation in the colon and colon tumour yield in mice treated with 1,2-dimethylhydrazine
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2003; 24(3): 527 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
K Husgafvel-Pursiainen
Molecular biomarkers in studies on environmental cancer
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, October 1, 2002; 56(10): 730 - 731.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
R. Miturski, M. Bogusiewicz, C. Ciotta, M. Bignami, M. Gogacz, and D. Burnouf
Mismatch Repair Genes and Microsatellite Instability as Molecular Markers for Gynecological Cancer Detection
Experimental Biology and Medicine, September 1, 2002; 227(8): 579 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
E. McCANLIES, D. P. LANDSITTEL, B. YUCESOY, V. VALLYATHAN, M. L. LUSTER, and D. S. SHARP
Significance of Genetic Information in Risk Assessment and Individual Classification Using Silicosis as a Case Model
Ann. Hyg., June 1, 2002; 46(4): 375 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
N. Hamajima, T. Saito, K. Matsuo, and K. Tajima
Competitive Amplification and Unspecific Amplification in Polymerase Chain Reaction with Confronting Two-Pair Primers
J. Mol. Diagn., May 1, 2002; 4(2): 103 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
S Burgaz, B Karahalil, Z Canli, F Terzioglu, G Ancel, R B. Anzion, R P Bos, and E Huttner
Assessment of genotoxic damage in nurses occupationally exposed to antineoplastics by the analysis of chromosomal aberrations
Human and Experimental Toxicology, March 1, 2002; 21(3): 129 - 135.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
R. Julian Preston
Quantitation of Molecular Endpoints for the Dose-Response Component of Cancer Risk Assessment
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2002; 30(1): 112 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. Tang, D. H. Phillips, M. Stampfer, L. A. Mooney, Y. Hsu, S. Cho, W.-Y. Tsai, J. Ma, K. J. Cole, M. N. She, et al.
Association between Carcinogen-DNA Adducts in White Blood Cells and Lung Cancer Risk in the Physicians Health Study
Cancer Res., September 1, 2001; 61(18): 6708 - 6712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. M. Whyatt, W. Jedrychowski, K. Hemminki, R. M. Santella, W.-Y. Tsai, K. Yang, and F. P. Perera
Biomarkers of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-DNA Damage and Cigarette Smoke Exposures in Paired Maternal and Newborn Blood Samples as a Measure of Differential Susceptibility
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2001; 10(6): 581 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
F. L. Martin
Genotoxins and the initiation of sporadic breast cancer
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2001; 16(2): 155 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.