Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2000 92(24):1999-2008; doi:10.1093/jnci/92.24.1999
© 2000 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, X.
Right arrow Articles by Keyomarsi, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, X.
Right arrow Articles by Keyomarsi, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 92, No. 24, 1999-2008, December 20, 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Protection of Normal Proliferating Cells Against Chemotherapy by Staurosporine-Mediated, Selective, and Reversible G1 Arrest

Xiaomei Chen, Michael Lowe, Thaddeus Herliczek, Michael J. Hall, Christopher Danes, David A. Lawrence, Khandan Keyomarsi

Affiliations of authors: X. Chen, M. Lowe, T. Herliczek, C. Danes (Laboratory of Diagnostic Oncology), M. J. Hall (Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology and Immunology), Division of Molecular Medicine, Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY; D. A. Lawrence, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology and Immunology, Division of Molecular Medicine, Wadsworth Center, and Department of Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Albany; K. Keyomarsi, Laboratory of Diagnostic Oncology, Division of Molecular Medicine, Wadsworth Center, and Department of Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Albany.

Correspondence to present address: Khandan Keyomarsi, Ph.D., Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Box 66, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030 (e-mail: kkeyomar{at}mdanderson.org).

Background: A major limiting factor in human cancer chemotherapy is toxicity in normal tissues. Our goal was to determine whether normal proliferating cells could be protected from chemotherapeutic agents by taking advantage of the differential drug sensitivity of cell cycle G1 checkpoint in normal and cancer cells. Methods: Normal mammary epithelial cells and mammary cancer cells were initially treated with staurosporine at a cytostatic (i.e., nonlethal) concentration, which preferentially arrests normal cells in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle without affecting the proliferation of tumor cells. After the selective arrest of normal cells in G0/G1, both normal and tumor cells were treated with doxorubicin or camptothecin, two cytotoxic (i.e., lethal) chemotherapeutic agents. Cells were then allowed to recover in drug-free medium for 12 days. Results: After pretreatment of both normal and tumor cells with staurosporine followed by treatment with doxorubicin or camptothecin, tumor cells were selectively killed by chemotherapeutic agents, whereas normal cells resumed proliferation after the drugs were removed. Pretreatment with staurosporine also protected normal circulating lymphocytes that had been induced to proliferate in vitro with phytohemagglutinin from chemotherapeutic agents. Staurosporine-induced arrest of normal cells in G0/G1 phase was reversible, and arrested cells tolerated doses of camptothecin that were more than 100-fold higher than necessary to eradicate all tumor cells in culture. Staurosporine-mediated G0/G1 arrest targets the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) pathway and was accompanied by a rapid decrease in cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 protein levels, increased binding of CDK inhibitors p21 and p27 to CDK2, and inhibition of CDK2 activity in normal cells. Conclusions: Breast cancer cells with defective checkpoints regulated by the pRb pathway can be targeted specifically with chemotherapeutic agents, following staurosporine-mediated, selective and reversible G0/G1 arrest in normal cells.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. McGahren-Murray, N. H.A. Terry, and K. Keyomarsi
The Differential Staurosporine-Mediated G1 Arrest in Normal versus Tumor Cells Is Dependent on the Retinoblastoma Protein
Cancer Res., October 1, 2006; 66(19): 9744 - 9753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory ScienceHome page
M. Kim, I.-Y. Park, J. Lim, Y. Kim, K. T. Han, W. H. Chung, and K. Han
Antitumor and Normal Cell Protective Effect of PKC412 in the Athymic Mouse Model of Ovarian Cancer
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2006; 36(4): 455 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. L. Bevins and S. G. Zimmer
It's About Time: Scheduling Alters Effect of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors on Camptothecin-Treated Cells
Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 65(15): 6957 - 6966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. V. Blagosklonny and A. B. Pardee
Exploiting Cancer Cell Cycling for Selective Protection of Normal Cells
Cancer Res., June 1, 2001; 61(11): 4301 - 4305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.