© 1999 by Oxford University Press
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 91, No. 15, 1304-1309,
August 4, 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press
Sunscreen Use and Duration of Sun Exposure: a Double-Blind, Randomized Trial
Affiliations of authors: P. Autier, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; J.-F. Doré (Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unit 453), S. Négrier (Department of Medical Oncology), Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; D. Liénard, F. Lejeune (Multidisciplinary Oncology Centre), R. Panizzon, D. Guggisberg (Department of Dermatology), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland; A. M. M. Eggermont, Department of Surgical Oncology, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Correspondence to: Philippe Autier, M.D., Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan (20141) (e-mail: pautier{at}ieo.it).
BACKGROUND: In epidemiologic studies, sunscreen use is associated with increased risk of cutaneous melanoma, basal cell skin cancer, and higher numbers of nevi. It has been proposed that sunscreens may encourage prolonged sun exposure because they delay sunburn occurrence. We examined whether, under habitual conditions of sunscreen use, the sun-protection factor (SPF) had an influence on sun-exposure duration. METHODS: Before the 1997 summer holidays, we randomly assigned 87 French and Swiss participants who were 18-24 years of age to receive an SPF 10 or an SPF 30 sunscreen. Neither medical personnel nor study participants were aware of their sunscreen assignment. Participants were asked to complete daily records of their sun exposure. To avoid influencing the recreational sun-exposure habits of the study participants, no recommendation was made about sun exposure or sun protection. Furthermore, participants were told that the trial end point was the number of pigmented skin lesions before and after the holidays. One subject was lost to follow-up. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The SPF 10 (n = 44) and SPF 30 (n = 42) groups had equivalent mean holiday durations (19.4 days versus 20.2 days) and mean quantities of sunscreen used (72.3 g versus 71.6 g). The mean cumulative sun exposures for the two groups were 58.2 hours and 72.6 hours, respectively (P = .011). The mean daily durations of sunbathing were 2.6 and 3.1 hours, respectively (P = .0013), and, for outdoor activities, they were 3.6 and 3.8 hours, respectively (P = .62). There was no difference in sunburn experience between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of higher SPF sunscreen seems to increase the duration of recreational sun exposure of young white Europeans.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. L. Harrison, R. MacLennan, and P. G. Buettner Sun Exposure and the Incidence of Melanocytic Nevi in Young Australian Children Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2008; 17(9): 2318 - 2324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Hart and R. F. DeMarco Primary Prevention of Skin Cancer in Children and Adolescents: A Review of the Literature Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 67 - 78. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Berwick Counterpoint: Sunscreen Use Is a Safe and Effective Approach to Skin Cancer Prevention Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2007; 16(10): 1923 - 1924. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. van der Pols, G. M. Williams, N. Pandeya, V. Logan, and A. C. Green Prolonged Prevention of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Skin by Regular Sunscreen Use Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2006; 15(12): 2546 - 2548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. English, E. Milne, and J. A. Simpson Sun Protection and the Development of Melanocytic Nevi in Children Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2005; 14(12): 2873 - 2876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Gallagher Sunscreens in melanoma and skin cancer prevention Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 2, 2005; 173(3): 244 - 245. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dupuy, A. Dunant, J.-J. Grob, and for Reseau d'Epidemiologie en Dermatologie Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Impact of High-Protection Sunscreens on Sun-Exposure Behavior Arch Dermatol, August 1, 2005; 141(8): 950 - 956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bauer, P. Buttner, T. S. Wiecker, H. Luther, and C. Garbe Effect of Sunscreen and Clothing on the Number of Melanocytic Nevi in 1,812 German Children Attending Day Care Am. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2005; 161(7): 620 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. O'Riordan, K. B. Lunde, J. Urschitz, and K. Glanz A Noninvasive Objective Measure of Sunscreen Use and Reapplication Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2005; 14(3): 722 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Balk, K. G. O'Connor, and M. Saraiya Counseling Parents and Children on Sun Protection: A National Survey of Pediatricians Pediatrics, October 1, 2004; 114(4): 1056 - 1064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. R. Stanton, M. Janda, P. D. Baade, and P. Anderson Primary prevention of skin cancer: a review of sun protection in Australia and internationally Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2004; 19(3): 369 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Stern Treatment of Photoaging N. Engl. J. Med., April 8, 2004; 350(15): 1526 - 1534. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Dennis, L. E. Beane Freeman, and M. J. VanBeek Sunscreen Use and the Risk for Melanoma: A Quantitative Review Ann Intern Med, December 16, 2003; 139(12): 966 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Boldeman, B. Jansson, H. Dal, and H. Ullen Sunbed use among Swedish adolescents in the 1990s: a decline with an unchanged relationship to health risk behaviors Scand J Public Health, May 1, 2003; 31(3): 233 - 237. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Huncharek and B. Kupelnick HUNCHAREK AND KUPELNICK RESPOND Am J Public Health, January 1, 2003; 93(1): 12 - 12. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Balk Sun sense: Advise families on how to protect children from sunburn, skin cancer AAP News, July 1, 2002; 21(1): 16 - 20. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Krowchuk Sun Protection for Children: What Parents Do AAP Grand Rounds, November 1, 2001; 6(5): 55 - 56. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Johnson, L. Davy, T. Boyett, L. Weathers, and R. G. Roetzheim Sun Protection Practices for Children: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Parent Behaviors Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, August 1, 2001; 155(8): 891 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Duez, M. Hanocq, and J. Dubois Photodynamic DNA damage mediated by {{delta}}-aminolevulinic acid-induced porphyrins Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2001; 22(5): 771 - 778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Young More About: Sunscreen Use and Duration of Sun Exposure: a Double-Blind, Randomized Trial J Natl Cancer Inst, September 20, 2000; 92(18): 1532 - 1532. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Gallagher, J. K. Rivers, T. K. Lee, C. D. Bajdik, D. I. McLean, and A. J. Coldman Broad-Spectrum Sunscreen Use and the Development of New Nevi in White Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, June 14, 2000; 283(22): 2955 - 2960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hemminki, V. J. Bykov, and J. A. Marcusson Re: Sunscreen Use and Duration of Sun Exposure: a Double-Blind, Randomized Trial J Natl Cancer Inst, December 1, 1999; 91(23): 2046 - 2047. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Autier, R. Pedeux, and J.-F. Dore RESPONSE: Re: Sunscreen Use and Duration of Sun Exposure: a Double-Blind, Randomized Trial J Natl Cancer Inst, December 1, 1999; 91(23): 2047 - 2047. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Emmons and G. A. Colditz Preventing Excess Sun Exposure: It Is Time for a National Policy J Natl Cancer Inst, August 4, 1999; 91(15): 1269 - 1270. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
















