Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1999 91(14):1233-1241; doi:10.1093/jnci/91.14.1233
© 1999 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aghi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Breakefield, X. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aghi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Breakefield, X. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 91, No. 14, 1233-1241, July 21, 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press


REPORTS

Folylpolyglutamyl Synthetase Gene Transfer and Glioma Antifolate Sensitivity in Culture and In Vivo

Manish Aghi, Christof M. Kramm, Xandra O. Breakefield

Affiliations of authors: M. Aghi, X. O. Breakefield, Molecular Neurogenetics Unit, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, and Program in Neurosciences, Harvard Medical School, Boston; C. M. Kramm, Molecular Neurogenetics Unit, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital.

Correspondence to: Xandra O. Breakefield, Ph.D., Molecular Neurogenetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital—East Bldg., Bldg. 149, 13th St., Charlestown, MA 02129.

BACKGROUND: Although antifolates are popular agents for use in chemotherapy, they display minimal toxicity against slow-growing tumors and are toxic to actively replicating cells in normal tissues. These drugs are converted intracellularly into polyglutamate derivatives by the enzyme folylpolyglutamyl synthetase (FPGS). Because tumors with high expression of FPGS often respond to nontoxic antifolate doses, we investigated whether augmenting tumoral FPGS activity by gene delivery would enhance tumoral antifolate sensitivity. METHODS: 9L rat gliosarcoma cells were stably transfected with a human FPGS complementary DNA (cDNA), producing 9L/FPGS cells. The sensitivity of these cells to the antifolates methotrexate and edatrexate was measured in culture and in subcutaneous tumors, as was their ability to increase the chemosensitivity of nearby nontransfected cells, i.e., a bystander effect. The antifolate sensitivity of nonselected cells transduced with a hybrid amplicon vector that expressed FPGS was also ascertained. RESULTS: In comparison with 9L cells, 9L/FPGS cells displayed enhanced sensitivity to 4-hour pulses of antifolate. Subcutaneous 9L/FPGS tumors responded as well to methotrexate given every third day as 9L tumors did to daily treatment. A modest bystander effect was observed with edatrexate treatment in culture and in vivo. The observed bystander effect appeared to result from the release of antifolates by transfected cells after the removal of extracellular drug. In culture, enhanced antifolate sensitivity was also seen in other stably transfected rodent and human glioma cell lines, including one with high pre-existing FPGS activity, and in canine and human glioblastoma cell lines transduced with a vector bearing FPGS cDNA. CONCLUSIONS: FPGS gene delivery enhances the antifolate sensitivity of several glioma cell lines and merits further evaluation as a therapeutic strategy.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
R. C. Cho, P. D. Cole, K.-J. Sohn, G. Gaisano, R. Croxford, B. A. Kamen, and Y.-I. Kim
Effects of folate and folylpolyglutamyl synthase modulation on chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2007; 6(11): 2909 - 2920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
K-J Sohn, F Smirnakis, D N Moskovitz, P Novakovic, Z Yates, M Lucock, R Croxford, and Y-I Kim
Effects of folylpolyglutamate synthetase modulation on chemosensitivity of colon cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate
Gut, December 1, 2004; 53(12): 1825 - 1831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. C. Corton, U. Apte, S. P. Anderson, P. Limaye, L. Yoon, J. Latendresse, C. Dunn, J. I. Everitt, K. A. Voss, C. Swanson, et al.
Mimetics of Caloric Restriction Include Agonists of Lipid-activated Nuclear Receptors
J. Biol. Chem., October 29, 2004; 279(44): 46204 - 46212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
N. Laurent, S. de Bouard, J.-S. Guillamo, C. Christov, R. Zini, H. Jouault, P. Andre, V. Lotteau, and M. Peschanski
Effects of the proteasome inhibitor ritonavir on glioma growth in vitro and in vivo
Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2004; 3(2): 129 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. J. Leclerc and J. C. Barredo
Folylpoly-{{gamma}}-glutamate Synthetase Gene mRNA Splice Variants and Protein Expression in Primary Human Leukemia Cells, Cell Lines, and Normal Human Tissues
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2001; 7(4): 942 - 951.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. Aghi, C. M. Kramm, and X. O. Breakefield
RESPONSE: Re: Folylpolyglutamyl Synthetase Gene Transfer and Glioma Antifolate Sensitivity in Culture and In Vivo
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 1, 1999; 91(23): 2048 - 2049.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
G. Jansen, G. J. Peters, H. M. Pinedo, D. G. Priest, and Y. G. Assaraf
Re: Folylpolyglutamyl Synthetase Gene Transfer and Glioma Antifolate Sensitivity in Culture and In Vivo
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 1, 1999; 91(23): 2047a - 2048a.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
F. M. Sirotnak
Enhancing Cytotoxic Sensitivity of Tumor Cells to Antifolates: Another Opportunity for Gene Therapy?
J Natl Cancer Inst, July 21, 1999; 91(14): 1178 - 1179.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.