Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1999 91(12):1025-1032; doi:10.1093/jnci/91.12.1025
© 1999 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feuer, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hankey, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feuer, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hankey, B. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 91, No. 12, 1025-1032, June 16, 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

Cancer Surveillance Series: Interpreting Trends in Prostate Cancer—Part II: Cause of Death Misclassification and the Recent Rise and Fall in Prostate Cancer Mortality

Eric J. Feuer, Ray M. Merrill, Benjamin F. Hankey

Affiliations of authors: E. J. Feuer, B. F. Hankey, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; R. M. Merrill, Health Sciences Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.

Correspondence to: Eric J. Feuer, Ph.D., National Institutes of Health, Executive Plaza North, Rm. 313, Bethesda, MD 20892.

BACKGROUND. The rise and fall of prostate cancer mortality correspond closely to the rise and fall of newly diagnosed cases. To understand this phenomenon, we explored the role that screening, treatment, iatrogenic (i.e., treatment-induced) deaths, and attribution bias (incorrect labeling of death from other causes as death from prostate cancer) have played in recent mortality trends. METHODS. Join point regression is utilized to assess the recent rise and fall in mortality and the relationship of total U.S. trends to those areas served by the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Cancer Registry Program. Incidence-based mortality (IBM) is estimated with the use of prostate cancer data from the SEER Program to partition (from overall prostate cancer mortality trends) the contribution of cases diagnosed since the widespread use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing starting in 1987. IBM is also used to examine the contribution of stage at diagnosis to the recent prostate cancer mortality trends. RESULTS. IBM for cases diagnosed since 1987 rose above the pre-1987 secular (i.e., background) trend, peaked in the early 1990s, and almost returned to the secular trend by 1994. This rise and fall of IBM track with the pool of prevalent cases diagnosed within the prior 2 years. IBM for cases diagnosed with metastatic disease fell starting in 1991, while IBM for those diagnosed with localized/regional disease was relatively flat. CONCLUSIONS. The rise and fall in prostate cancer mortality observed since the introduction of PSA testing in the general population are consistent with a hypothesis that a fixed percent of the rising and falling pool of recently diagnosed patients who die of other causes may be mislabeled as dying of prostate cancer. The decline in IBM for distant stage disease and flat IBM trends for localized/regional disease provide some evidence of improved prognosis for screen-detected cases, although alternative interpretations are possible.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. Kvale, A. Auvinen, H.-O. Adami, A. Klint, E. Hernes, B. Moller, E. Pukkala, H. H. Storm, L. Tryggvadottir, S. Tretli, et al.
Interpreting Trends in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the Five Nordic Countries
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 19, 2007; 99(24): 1881 - 1887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J Ferlay, P Autier, M Boniol, M Heanue, M Colombet, and P Boyle
Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006
Ann. Onc., February 7, 2007; (2007) mdl498v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
W. Oberaigner, W. Horninger, H. Klocker, D. Schonitzer, W. Stuhlinger, and G. Bartsch
Reduction of Prostate Cancer Mortality in Tyrol, Austria, after Introduction of Prostate-specific Antigen Testing
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2006; 164(4): 376 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
T. S. Field, D. S. M. Buist, C. Doubeni, S. Enger, H. Fouayzi, G. Hart, E. J. Korner, L. Lamerato, D. J. Bachman, J. Ellis, et al.
Disparities and Survival Among Breast Cancer Patients
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, November 1, 2005; 2005(35): 88 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. Jemal, E. Ward, X. Wu, H. J. Martin, C. C. McLaughlin, and M. J. Thun
Geographic Patterns of Prostate Cancer Mortality and Variations in Access to Medical Care in the United States
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2005; 14(3): 590 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. Wilding and P. Remington
Period Analysis of Prostate Cancer Survival
J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2005; 23(3): 407 - 409.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
E. J Feuer, R. Etzioni, K. A Cronin, and A. Mariotto
The use of modeling to understand the impact of screening on US mortality: examples from mammography and PSA testing
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, December 1, 2004; 13(6): 421 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
M. McNaughton-Collins, E. Walker-Corkery, and M. J. Barry
Health-Related Quality of Life, Satisfaction, and Economic Outcome Measures in Studies of Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment, 1990-2000
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 78 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. B. Carter
Prostate Cancers in Men with Low PSA Levels -- Must We Find Them?
N. Engl. J. Med., May 27, 2004; 350(22): 2292 - 2294.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
P. A. Godley, A. P. Schenck, M. A. Amamoo, V. J. Schoenbach, S. Peacock, M. Manning, M. Symons, and J. A. Talcott
Racial Differences in Mortality Among Medicare Recipients After Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 19, 2003; 95(22): 1702 - 1710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
H. K. Weir, M. J. Thun, B. F. Hankey, L. A. G. Ries, H. L. Howe, P. A. Wingo, A. Jemal, E. Ward, R. N. Anderson, and B. K. Edwards
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2000, Featuring the Uses of Surveillance Data for Cancer Prevention and Control
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 3, 2003; 95(17): 1276 - 1299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
G. Draisma, R. Boer, S. J. Otto, I. W. van der Cruijsen, R. A. M. Damhuis, F. H. Schroder, and H. J. de Koning
Lead Times and Overdetection Due to Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening: Estimates From the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 18, 2003; 95(12): 868 - 878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. F. Shariat, M. W. Kattan, S. Erdamar, C. Nguyen, P. T. Scardino, D. M. Spencer, T. M. Wheeler, and K. M. Slawin
Detection of Clinically Significant, Occult Prostate Cancer Metastases in Lymph Nodes Using a Splice Variant-Specific RT-PCR Assay for Human Glandular Kallikrein
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2003; 21(7): 1223 - 1231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
R. M. Hoffman
An Argument Against Routine Prostate Cancer Screening
Arch Intern Med, March 24, 2003; 163(6): 663 - 665.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
P. B. Bach, M. J. Kelley, R. C. Tate, and D. C. McCrory
Screening for Lung Cancer: A Review of the Current Literature
Chest, January 1, 2003; 123(1_suppl): 72S - 82S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. Harris and K. N. Lohr
Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Update of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, December 3, 2002; 137(11): 917 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
G. Lu-Yao, P. C Albertsen, J. L Stanford, T. A Stukel, E. S Walker-Corkery, and M. J Barry
Natural experiment examining impact of aggressive screening and treatment on prostate cancer mortality in two fixed cohorts from Seattle area and Connecticut
BMJ, October 5, 2002; 325(7367): 740 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
L. D. Andersen, P. Remington, A. Trentham-Dietz, and M. Reeves
Assessing a Decade of Progress in Cancer Control
Oncologist, June 1, 2002; 7(3): 200 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. P. Gelmann, D. J. Steadman, J. Ma, N. Ahronovitz, H. J. Voeller, S. Swope, M. Abbaszadegan, K. M. Brown, K. Strand, R. B. Hayes, et al.
Occurrence of NKX3.1 C154T Polymorphism in Men with and without Prostate Cancer and Studies of Its Effect on Protein Function
Cancer Res., May 1, 2002; 62(9): 2654 - 2659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
A. N. Vis
Does PSA screening reduce prostate cancer mortality?
Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 1, 2002; 166(5): 600 - 601.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
W. C. Black, D. A. Haggstrom, and H. Gilbert Welch
All-Cause Mortality in Randomized Trials of Cancer Screening
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 6, 2002; 94(3): 167 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
H. L. Howe, P. A. Wingo, M. J. Thun, L. A. G. Ries, H. M. Rosenberg, E. G. Feigal, and B. K. Edwards
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer (1973 Through 1998), Featuring Cancers With Recent Increasing Trends
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 6, 2001; 93(11): 824 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
L. Liu, W. Cozen, L. Bernstein, R. K. Ross, and D. Deapen
Changing Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and Prostate Cancer Incidence
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 2, 2001; 93(9): 705 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. R. Simoneau, E. W. Gerner, M. Phung, C. E. McLaren, and F. L. Meyskens Jr.
{{alpha}}-Difluoromethylornithine and Polyamine Levels in the Human Prostate: Results of a Phase IIa Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 3, 2001; 93(1): 57 - 59.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. Baum, H G. Welch, T M Reynolds, A S Wierzbicki, A. G Threlfall, S. Collins, C. B J Woodman, M. P Coleman, D. Stockton, P. Babb, et al.
Survival and reduction in mortality from breast cancer
BMJ, December 9, 2000; 321(7274): 1470a - 1470.
[Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
B. F. Hankey, L. A. Ries, and B. K. Edwards
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program: A National Resource
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 1999; 8(12): 1117 - 1121.
[Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
B. F. Hankey, E. J. Feuer, L. X. Clegg, R. B. Hayes, J. M. Legler, P. C. Prorok, L. A. Ries, R. M. Merrill, and R. S. Kaplan
Cancer Surveillance Series: Interpreting Trends in Prostate Cancer—Part I: Evidence of the Effects of Screening in Recent Prostate Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Survival Rates
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 16, 1999; 91(12): 1017 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. Etzioni, J. M. Legler, E. J. Feuer, R. M. Merrill, K. A. Cronin, and B. F. Hankey
Cancer Surveillance Series: Interpreting Trends in Prostate Cancer—Part III: Quantifying the Link Between Population Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing and Recent Declines in Prostate Cancer Mortality
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 16, 1999; 91(12): 1033 - 1039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.