Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1997 89(7):488-496; doi:10.1093/jnci/89.7.488
© 1997 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, N. F.
Right arrow Articles by Tritchler, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, N. F.
Right arrow Articles by Tritchler, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal Of The National Cancer Institute, Vol 89, 488-496, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: results from a randomized trial. Canadian Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention Study Group

NF Boyd, C Greenberg, G Lockwood, L Little, L Martin, J Byng, M Yaffe and D Tritchler
Division of Epidemiology and Statistics, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada.

BACKGROUND: The appearance of breast tissue on mammography varies according to its composition. Fat is radiolucent and appears dark on mammography, while stromal and epithelial tissue has greater optical density and appears light. Extensive areas of radiologically dense breast tissue seen on mammography are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the adoption of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet for 2 years would reduce breast density. METHODS: Women with radiologic densities in more than 50% of the breast area on mammography were recruited and randomly allocated to an intervention group taught to reduce intake of dietary fat (mean, 21% of calories) and increase complex carbohydrate (mean, 61% of calories) or to a control group (mean, 32% of calories from fat and 50% of calories from carbohydrates). Mammographic images from 817 subjects were taken at baseline and compared with those taken 2 years after random allocation by use of a quantitative image analysis system, without knowledge of the dietary group of the subjects or of the sequence in which pairs of images had been taken. The effects of the intervention on the mammographic features of breast area, area of dense tissues in the breast, and the percent of the breast occupied by dense tissue were examined using t tests. Multiple regression was used to examine these effects while accounting for age at trial entry, weight change, and menopausal status. RESULTS: After 2 years, the total area of the breast was reduced by an average of 233.7 mm2 (2.4%) (95% confidence interval [CI] = 106.9-360.6) in the intervention group compared with an average increase of 26.3 mm2 (0.3%) (95% CI = -108.0-160.5) in the control group (P = .01). The area of density was reduced by 374.4 mm2 (6.1%) (95% CI = 235.1-513.8) in the intervention group compared with an average of 127.7 mm2 (2.1%) (95% CI = 8.6-246.7) in the control group (P = .01). Weight loss was associated with a reduction in breast area. The effect of the intervention on breast area was only marginally statistically significant after weight change, menopausal status, and age at trial entry were taken into account (P = .06). Greater weight loss and becoming postmenopausal were associated with statistically significant reductions in the area of density on the mammographic image at 2 years (P = .04 and P<.001, respectively). Age at entry into the trial was marginally significant in the same direction (P = .06). The effect of the intervention on area of density remained statistically significant after controlling for weight loss, age at entry, and menopausal status (P = .03). The change in the percentage of dense tissue in the mammographic image was not significantly different between the two groups (P = .71). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These results show that after 2 years, a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet reduced the area of mammographic density, a radiographic feature of the breast that is a risk factor for breast cancer. Longer observation of a larger number of subjects will be required to determine whether these effects are associated with changes in risk of breast cancer.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. R. Bakic, A.-K. Carton, D. Kontos, C. Zhang, A. B. Troxel, and A. D. A. Maidment
Breast Percent Density: Estimation on Digital Mammograms and Central Tomosynthesis Projections
Radiology, July 1, 2009; 252(1): 40 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
G. Maskarinec, M. Verheus, F. M. Steinberg, P. Amato, M. K. Cramer, R. D. Lewis, M. J. Murray, R. L. Young, and W. W. Wong
Various Doses of Soy Isoflavones Do Not Modify Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women
J. Nutr., May 1, 2009; 139(5): 981 - 986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. J. Heine, M. J. Carston, C. G. Scott, K. R. Brandt, F.-F. Wu, V. S. Pankratz, T. A. Sellers, and C. M. Vachon
An Automated Approach for Estimation of Breast Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2008; 17(11): 3090 - 3097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
T. E. Rohan, A. Negassa, R. T. Chlebowski, N. L. Lasser, A. McTiernan, R. S. Schenken, M. Ginsberg, S. Wassertheil-Smoller, and D. L. Page
Estrogen plus Progestin and Risk of Benign Proliferative Breast Disease
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2008; 17(9): 2337 - 2343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. M. Blackmore, J. A. Knight, and L. Lilge
Association between Transillumination Breast Spectroscopy and Quantitative Mammographic Features of the Breast
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1043 - 1050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. S. Hwang, D. L. Miglioretti, R. Ballard-Barbash, D. L. Weaver, K. Kerlikowske, and for the National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Su
Association between Breast Density and Subsequent Breast Cancer Following Treatment for Ductal Carcinoma In situ
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2007; 16(12): 2587 - 2593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. L Blackburn and K. A Wang
Dietary fat reduction and breast cancer outcome: results from the Women's Intervention Nutrition Study (WINS)
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2007; 86(3): 878S - 881S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. Demark-Wahnefried, E. C. Clipp, I. M. Lipkus, D. Lobach, D. C. Snyder, R. Sloane, B. Peterson, J. M. Macri, C. L. Rock, C. M. McBride, et al.
Main Outcomes of the FRESH START Trial: A Sequentially Tailored, Diet and Exercise Mailed Print Intervention Among Breast and Prostate Cancer Survivors
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2007; 25(19): 2709 - 2718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K M Blackmore, J A Knight, R Jong, and L Lilge
Assessing breast tissue density by transillumination breast spectroscopy (TIBS): an intermediate indicator of cancer risk
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2007; 80(955): 545 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. M. Vachon, V. S. Pankratz, C. G. Scott, S. D. Maloney, K. Ghosh, K. R. Brandt, T. Milanese, M. J. Carston, and T. A. Sellers
Longitudinal Trends in Mammographic Percent Density and Breast Cancer Risk
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 921 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. L. Irwin, E. J. Aiello, A. McTiernan, L. Bernstein, F. D. Gilliland, R. N. Baumgartner, K. B. Baumgartner, and R. Ballard-Barbash
Physical Activity, Body Mass Index, and Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Survivors
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2007; 25(9): 1061 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. T. Chlebowski, G. L. Blackburn, C. A. Thomson, D. W. Nixon, A. Shapiro, M. K. Hoy, M. T. Goodman, A. E. Giuliano, N. Karanja, P. McAndrew, et al.
Dietary Fat Reduction and Breast Cancer Outcome: Interim Efficacy Results From the Women's Intervention Nutrition Study
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 20, 2006; 98(24): 1767 - 1776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. J. Fabian and B. F. Kimler
Mammographic Density: Use in Risk Assessment and as a Biomarker in Prevention Trials
J. Nutr., October 1, 2006; 136(10): 2705S - 2708S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. E. Martin, M. A. Helvie, C. Zhou, M. A. Roubidoux, J. E. Bailey, C. Paramagul, C. E. Blane, K. A. Klein, S. S. Sonnad, and H.-P. Chan
Mammographic Density Measured with Quantitative Computer-aided Method: Comparison with Radiologists' Estimates and BI-RADS Categories
Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 656 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. R. Palomares, J. R.B. Machia, C. D. Lehman, J. R. Daling, and A. McTiernan
Mammographic density correlation with gail model breast cancer risk estimates and component risk factors.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2006; 15(7): 1324 - 1330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
V. A. McCormack and I. dos Santos Silva
Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2006; 15(6): 1159 - 1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
N. F. Boyd, L. J. Martin, Q. Li, L. Sun, A. M. Chiarelli, G. Hislop, M. J. Yaffe, and S. Minkin
Mammographic density as a surrogate marker for the effects of hormone therapy on risk of breast cancer.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2006; 15(5): 961 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. Maskarinec, I. Pagano, G. Lurie, and L. N. Kolonel
A longitudinal investigation of mammographic density: the multiethnic cohort.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2006; 15(4): 732 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. Nagata, T. Matsubara, H. Fujita, Y. Nagao, C. Shibuya, Y. Kashiki, and H. Shimizu
Associations of Mammographic Density with Dietary Factors in Japanese Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2005; 14(12): 2877 - 2880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. Haars, P. A.H. van Noord, C. H. van Gils, D. E. Grobbee, and P. H.M. Peeters
Measurements of Breast Density: No Ratio for a Ratio
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2005; 14(11): 2634 - 2640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M K Simick and L Lilge
Optical transillumination spectroscopy to quantify parenchymal tissue density: an indicator for breast cancer risk
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2005; 78(935): 1009 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Berube, C. Diorio, B. Masse, N. Hebert-Croteau, C. Byrne, G. Cote, M. Pollak, M. Yaffe, and J. Brisson
Vitamin D and Calcium Intakes from Food or Supplements and Mammographic Breast Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2005; 14(7): 1653 - 1659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
C J Fabian, B F Kimler, M S Mayo, and S A Khan
Breast-tissue sampling for risk assessment and prevention
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2005; 12(2): 185 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. L. Neuhouser
Soy and Mammographic Breast Density: Plausible Hypothesis but Limited Evidence in Humans
J. Nutr., November 1, 2004; 134(11): 2911 - 2912.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
G. Maskarinec, Y. Takata, A. A. Franke, A. E. Williams, and S. P. Murphy
A 2-Year Soy Intervention in Premenopausal Women Does Not Change Mammographic Densities
J. Nutr., November 1, 2004; 134(11): 3089 - 3094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
L. A. Habel, J. J. Dignam, S. R. Land, M. Salane, A. M. Capra, and T. B. Julian
Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer After Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 6, 2004; 96(19): 1467 - 1472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. L. Prentice, W. C. Willett, P. Greenwald, D. Alberts, L. Bernstein, N. F. Boyd, T. Byers, S. K. Clinton, G. Fraser, L. Freedman, et al.
Nutrition and Physical Activity and Chronic Disease Prevention: Research Strategies and Recommendations
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 1, 2004; 96(17): 1276 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. L. Frankenfeld, A. McTiernan, E. J. Aiello, W. K. Thomas, K. LaCroix, J. Schramm, S. M. Schwartz, V. L. Holt, and J. W. Lampe
Mammographic Density in Relation to Daidzein-Metabolizing Phenotypes in Overweight, Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2004; 13(7): 1156 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. D. Holmes, S. Liu, S. E. Hankinson, G. A. Colditz, D. J. Hunter, and W. C. Willett
Dietary Carbohydrates, Fiber, and Breast Cancer Risk
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2004; 159(8): 732 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
R. L. Smith, S. Pruthi, and L. A. Fitzpatrick
Evaluation and Management of Breast Pain
Mayo Clin. Proc., March 1, 2004; 79(3): 353 - 372.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. P. Pierce, V. A. Newman, S. W. Flatt, S. Faerber, C. L. Rock, L. Natarajan, B. J. Caan, E. B. Gold, K. A. Hollenbach, L. Wasserman, et al.
Telephone Counseling Intervention Increases Intakes of Micronutrient- and Phytochemical-Rich Vegetables, Fruit and Fiber in Breast Cancer Survivors
J. Nutr., February 1, 2004; 134(2): 452 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Harvey and V. E. Bovbjerg
Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Breast Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer Risk
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 29 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. Spentzos, C. Mantzoros, M. M. Regan, M. E. Morrissey, S. Duggan, S. Flickner-Garvey, H. McCormick, W. DeWolf, S. Balk, and G. J. Bubley
Minimal Effect of a Low-Fat/High Soy Diet for Asymptomatic, Hormonally Naive Prostate Cancer Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(9): 3282 - 3287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
A. McTiernan
Behavioral Risk Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Risk Be Modified?
Oncologist, August 1, 2003; 8(4): 326 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. T. Chlebowski and A. McTiernan
Biological Significance of Interventions That Change Breast Density
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 1, 2003; 95(1): 4 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
G. A. Greendale, B. A. Reboussin, S. Slone, C. Wasilauskas, M. C. Pike, and G. Ursin
Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Change in Mammographic Density
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 1, 2003; 95(1): 30 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. T. Chlebowski, E. Aiello, and A. McTiernan
Weight Loss in Breast Cancer Patient Management
J. Clin. Oncol., February 15, 2002; 20(4): 1128 - 1143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
K. W. Singletary and S. M. Gapstur
Alcohol and Breast Cancer: Review of Epidemiologic and Experimental Evidence and Potential Mechanisms
JAMA, November 7, 2001; 286(17): 2143 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. Maskarinec, L. Meng, and G. Ursin
Ethnic differences in mammographic densities
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2001; 30(5): 959 - 965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Shah, A. Cerussi, C. Eker, J. Espinoza, J. Butler, J. Fishkin, R. Hornung, and B. Tromberg
Noninvasive functional optical spectroscopy of human breast tissue
PNAS, March 29, 2001; (2001) 71511098.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Brisson, B. Brisson, G. Coté, E. Maunsell, S. Bérubé, and J. Robert
Tamoxifen and Mammographic Breast Densities
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2000; 9(9): 911 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. T. Chlebowski
Reducing the Risk of Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., July 20, 2000; 343(3): 191 - 198.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. M. Vachon, L. H. Kushi, J. R. Cerhan, C. C. Kuni, and T. A. Sellers
Association of Diet and Mammographic Breast Density in the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Cohort
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2000; 9(2): 151 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. Atkinson, R. Warren, S. A. Bingham, and N. E. Day
Mammographic Patterns as a Predictive Biomarker of Breast Cancer Risk: Effect of Tamoxifen
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 1999; 8(10): 863 - 866.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
N. F. Boyd, G. A. Lockwood, L. J. Martin, J. A. Knight, R. A. Jong, E. Fishell, J. W. Byng, M. J. Yaffe, and D. L. Tritchler
Mammographic Densities and Risk of Breast Cancer Among Subjects With a Family History of This Disease
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 18, 1999; 91(16): 1404 - 1408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
C. J. Baines and R. Dayan
A Tangled Web: Factors Likely to Affect the Efficacy of Screening Mammography
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 19, 1999; 91(10): 833 - 838.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. McTiernan, R. S. Schwartz, J. Potter, and D. Bowen
Exercise Clinical Trials in Cancer Prevention Research:A Call to Action
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 1999; 8(3): 201 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. A. Knight, L. J. Martin, C. V. Greenberg, G. A. Lockwood, J. W. Byng, M. J. Yaffe, D. L. Tritchler, and N. F. Boyd
Macronutrient Intake and Change in Mammographic Density at Menopause: Results from a Randomized Trial
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 1999; 8(2): 123 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. J. Hunter
Role of Dietary Fat in the Causation of Breast Cancer: Counterpoint
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 1999; 8(1): 9 - 13.
[Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Shah, A. Cerussi, C. Eker, J. Espinoza, J. Butler, J. Fishkin, R. Hornung, and B. Tromberg
Noninvasive functional optical spectroscopy of human breast tissue
PNAS, April 10, 2001; 98(8): 4420 - 4425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.