Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1996 88(23):1764-1769; doi:10.1093/jnci/88.23.1764
© 1996 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heimann, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hellman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heimann, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hellman, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 88, No. 23, 1764-1769, December 4, 1996
© 1996 Oxford University Press

Angiogenesis as a Predictor of Long-term Survival for Patients With Node-Negative Breast Cancer

Ruth Heimann, Donald Ferguson, Claire Powers, Wendy M. Recant, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Samuel Hellman

Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, Division of the Biological Sciences, The Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago IL
Department of Surgery, Division of the Biological Sciences, The Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago IL
Department of Pathology, Division of the Biological Sciences, The Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago IL

Correspondence to: Ruth Heimann, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, UC 0085, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL 60637

BACKGROUND: Angiogenesis (the formation of new blood vessels) is necessary for tumor growth and metastasis.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether angiogenesis as measured by microvessel count (MVC) predicts clinical outcome in a series of patients with axillary lymph node-negative breast cancer who received no adjuvant therapy and who were followed for a long period of time. Our long-term goal is to identify those patients who may or may not need adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS: Pathologic archival material and clinical information were analyzed for 167 patients treated with mastectomy from 1941 through 1987; none received adjuvant treatment The median follow-up time among living patients was 15.4 years (range, 2.6–35.8 years). Ninety-six (58%) patients had a tumor size of 2 cm or less, 52 (31 %) had tumors of 2.1–3 cm, and 19 (11%) had tumors of larger than 3 cm. Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were stained for expression of CD34 antigen on microves-sel-associated endothelial cells by use of a monoclonal anti-CD34 antibody. Vascularity was defined as the number of microvessels (average of the three highest counts) per high-power microscopic field (400x magnification) in the area of highest vascular density. A high vascular count was defined as 15 or more microvessels per field. Actuarial survival curves were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons were made with the logrank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis. AD P values were based on two-sided testing.

RESULTS: The 20-year disease-free survival (DFS) for the 167 node-negative patients treated with mastectomy and no adjuvant therapy was 74.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 64.7%–82.0%). The 20-year DFS was 93.1% (95% CI = 79.9%–97.7%) if the MVC was low versus 68.9% (95% CI = 56.8%-78.0%) if the MVC was high (P = .018). This difference was maintained irrespective of tumor size: for tumor size of 2 an or less (93.3% [95% CI = 753%–983%] versus 67.8% [95% CI = 50.1%–803%]) and for tumor size of larger than 2 cm (92.3% [95% CI = 56.6%–98.9%] versus 70.9% [95% CI = 54.6%–81.6%]). However, the likelihood of a high MVC was greater with large tumors (P = .05). The proportions of tumors with low and high MVC were 33% and 67%, respectively, if the tumor size was 2 cm or less, and 20% and 80%, respectively, if tumor size was larger than 2 an. There was no significant difference in the 20-year DFS as a function of tumor grade (P = .2). After combining patients with tumors of nuclear grades 2 and 3 compared with those of nuclear grade 1, the 20-year DFS was 93.9% (95% CI = 77J%–98.4%) for low MVC versus 66.9% (95% CI = 52.2%–78.0%) for high MVC (P = .02). In a multivariate analysis that included the variables tumor size, age, nuclear grade, estrogen receptor status, and MVC, only MVC appeared to be an independent prognostic indicator (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS: Angiogenesis as measured by MVC is a reliable independent prognostic marker of long-term survival in patients with node-negative breast cancer. The prognostic usefulness of this marker is maintained after more than 15 years of follow-up. A low MVC identifies a subgroup of patients with DFS of 92% or more, independent of tumor size or grade. [J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88: 1764–9]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
I. Benakanakere, C. Besch-Williford, J. Schnell, S. Brandt, M. R. Ellersieck, A. Molinolo, and S. M. Hyder
Natural and Synthetic Progestins Accelerate 7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene-Initiated Mammary Tumors and Increase Angiogenesis in Sprague-Dawley Rats.
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 12(13): 4062 - 4071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
T. Yabu, H. Tomimoto, Y. Taguchi, S. Yamaoka, Y. Igarashi, and T. Okazaki
Thalidomide-induced antiangiogenic action is mediated by ceramide through depletion of VEGF receptors, and is antagonized by sphingosine-1-phosphate
Blood, July 1, 2005; 106(1): 125 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Q. Wu, R. Burghardt, and S. Safe
Vitamin D-interacting Protein 205 (DRIP205) Coactivation of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} (ER{alpha}) Involves Multiple Domains of Both Proteins
J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 2004; 279(51): 53602 - 53612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
B. Uzzan, P. Nicolas, M. Cucherat, and G.-Y. Perret
Microvessel Density as a Prognostic Factor in Women with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis
Cancer Res., May 1, 2004; 64(9): 2941 - 2955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. Wulfing, C. Kersting, J. Tio, R.-J. Fischer, C. Wulfing, C. Poremba, R. Diallo, W. Bocker, and L. Kiesel
Endothelin-1-, Endothelin-A-, and Endothelin-B-Receptor Expression Is Correlated with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression and Angiogenesis in Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 10(7): 2393 - 2400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
N B Teo, B S Shoker, C Jarvis, J P Sloane, and C Holcombe
Thymidine phosphorylase expression and stromal vascularity in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
J. Clin. Pathol., December 1, 2003; 56(12): 919 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
Y. Liu, L. H. Cheung, P. Thorpe, and M. G. Rosenblum
Mechanistic studies of a novel human fusion toxin composed of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)121 and the serine protease granzyme B: Directed apoptotic events in vascular endothelial cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2003; 2(10): 949 - 959.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. C. Voogd, M. Nielsen, J. L. Peterse, M. Blichert-Toft, H. Bartelink, M. Overgaard, G. van Tienhoven, K. W. Andersen, R. J. Sylvester, and J. A. van Dongen
Differences in Risk Factors for Local and Distant Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Therapy or Mastectomy for Stage I and II Breast Cancer: Pooled Results of Two Large European Randomized Trials
J. Clin. Oncol., March 15, 2001; 19(6): 1688 - 1697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. T.-P. Poon, S.-T. Fan, and J. Wong
Clinical Implications of Circulating Angiogenic Factors in Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., February 15, 2001; 19(4): 1207 - 1225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Adams, P. J. Carder, S. Downey, M. A. Forbes, K. MacLennan, V. Allgar, S. Kaufman, S. Hallam, R. Bicknell, J. J. Walker, et al.
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in Breast Cancer: Comparison of Plasma, Serum, and Tissue VEGF and Microvessel Density and Effects of Tamoxifen
Cancer Res., June 1, 2000; 60(11): 2898 - 2905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. Heimann and S. Hellman
Clinical Progression of Breast Cancer Malignant Behavior: What to Expect and When to Expect it
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2000; 18(3): 591 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. Heimann, F. Lan, R. McBride, and S. Hellman
Separating Favorable from Unfavorable Prognostic Markers in Breast Cancer: The Role of E-Cadherin
Cancer Res., January 1, 2000; 60(2): 298 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. D. Placido, C. Carlomagno, F. Ciardiello, M. D. Laurentiis, S. Pepe, A. Ruggiero, G. Tortora, L. Panico, A. D'Antonio, G. Pettinato, et al.
Measurement of Neovascularization Is an Independent Prognosticator of Survival in Node-negative Breast Cancer Patients with Long-Term Follow-Up
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 1999; 5(10): 2854 - 2859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
T. G. Karrison, D. J. Ferguson, and P. Meier
Dormancy of Mammary Carcinoma After Mastectomy
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 6, 1999; 91(1): 80 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
G. Montrucchio, A. Sapino, B. Bussolati, G. Ghisolfi, S. Rizea-Savu, L. Silvestro, E. Lupia, and G. Camussi
Potential Angiogenic Role of Platelet-Activating Factor in Human Breast Cancer
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 1998; 153(5): 1589 - 1596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.