Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1995 87(21):1622-1629; doi:10.1093/jnci/87.21.1622
© 1995 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, C.
Right arrow Articles by Haile, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, C.
Right arrow Articles by Haile, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 87, No. 21, 1622-1629, November 1, 1995
© 1995 Oxford University Press

Mammographic Features and Breast Cancer Risk: Effects With Time, Age, and Menopause Status

Celia Byrne, Catherine Schairer, John Wolfe, Navin Parekh, Martine Salane, Louise A. Brinton, Robert Hoover, Robert Haile

Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Etiology, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD
Department of Radiology, Hutzel Hospital Detroit, MI
Department of Epidemiology. University of California Los Angeles, School of Public Health
J. Wolfe (deceased September 1993), Department of Radiology, Hutzel Hospital

Correspondence to present address: Celia Byrne, Ph.D., Channing Laboratory, 180 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115.

Background: Mammographic images from women with a high proportion of epithelial and stromal breast tissues are described as showing high-density parenchymal patterns. Most past studies that noted an increase in breast cancer risk associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns showing high density either 1) lacked information on other breast cancer risk factors, 2) were too small, or 3) included insufficient follow-up time to adequately resolve persisting doubts whether mammographic features are "independent" measures of breast cancer risk and not a detection artifact. Purpose: The purpose of this study was twofold: 1) to evaluate the associations between mammographic features and other breast cancer risk factors and 2) to assess effects of mammographic features on breast cancer risk by time, age, and menopause status. Methods: To address these questions, we analyzed detailed information from a large, nested case-control study with 16 years of follow-up. This study used information from both screening and follow-up phases of the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project, a nationwide program that offered annual breast cancer screening for more than 280 000 women from 1973 to 1980. Mammographic features were assessed from the base-line screening mammographic examination for 1880 incident case subjects and 2152 control subjects. Control subjects were randomly selected from women of the same age and race as each case subject. Control subjects attended the same screening center as the case subject and were free of breast cancer at the case subject's date of diagnosis. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) provided estimates of the relative risk of breast cancer. Results: Mammographic features were associated with known breast cancer risk factors. However, the high-density parenchymal pattern effects were independent of family history, age at first birth, alcohol consumption, and benign breast disease. The increased risk for women with Wolfe's two high-density parenchymal patterns, P2 (OR = 3.2; 95% CI = 2.5–4.0) and Dy (OR = 2.9; 95% CI = 2.2–3.9), was explained primarily by measured percent of the breast with dense mammographic appearance. Compared with women with no visible breast density, women who had a breast density of 75% or greater had an almost fivefold increased risk of breast cancer (95% CI = 3.6–7.1). These effects persisted for 10 or more years and were noted for both premenopausal and postmenopausal women of all ages. Conclusions: Of the breast cancer risk factors assessed in the participants, high-density mammographic parenchymal patterns, as measured by the proportion of breast area composed of epithelial and stromal tissue, had the greatest impact on breast cancer risk. Of the breast cancers in this study, 28% were attributable to having 50% or greater breast density. [J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:1622–9]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Med ScreenHome page
C. Nickson and A. M Kavanagh
Tumour size at detection according to different measures of mammographic breast density
J Med Screen, September 1, 2009; 16(3): 140 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Decensi, C. Robertson, A. Guerrieri-Gonzaga, D. Serrano, M. Cazzaniga, S. Mora, M. Gulisano, H. Johansson, V. Galimberti, E. Cassano, et al.
Randomized Double-Blind 2 x 2 Trial of Low-Dose Tamoxifen and Fenretinide for Breast Cancer Prevention in High-Risk Premenopausal Women
J. Clin. Oncol., August 10, 2009; 27(23): 3749 - 3756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. R. Bakic, A.-K. Carton, D. Kontos, C. Zhang, A. B. Troxel, and A. D. A. Maidment
Breast Percent Density: Estimation on Digital Mammograms and Central Tomosynthesis Projections
Radiology, July 1, 2009; 252(1): 40 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. S.M. Buist, M. L. Anderson, S. D. Reed, E. J. Aiello Bowles, E. D. Fitzgibbons, J. C. Gandara, D. Seger, and K. M. Newton
Short-Term Hormone Therapy Suspension and Mammography Recall: A Randomized Trial
Ann Intern Med, June 2, 2009; 150(11): 752 - 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. McTiernan, C.Y. Wang, B. Sorensen, L. Xiao, D. S.M. Buist, E. J. Aiello Bowles, E. White, M. A. Rossing, J. Potter, and N. Urban
No Effect of Aspirin on Mammographic Density in a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2009; 18(5): 1524 - 1530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. Ibarra-Drendall, L. G. Wilke, C. Zalles, V. Scott, L. E. Archer, S. Lem, L. D. Yee, J. Lester, S. Kulkarni, C. Murekeyisoni, et al.
Reproducibility of Random Periareolar Fine Needle Aspiration in a Multi-Institutional Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Cross-Sectional Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2009; 18(5): 1379 - 1385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. Ma, J. Luo, M. F. Press, Y. Wang, L. Bernstein, and G. Ursin
Is There a Difference in the Association between Percent Mammographic Density and Subtypes of Breast Cancer? Luminal A and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2009; 18(2): 479 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. Ursin, E. O. Lillie, E. Lee, M. Cockburn, N. J. Schork, W. Cozen, Y. R. Parisky, A. S. Hamilton, M. A. Astrahan, and T. Mack
The Relative Importance of Genetics and Environment on Mammographic Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2009; 18(1): 102 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. A. Douglas, M.-H. Roy-Gagnon, C. Zhou, B. D. Mitchell, A. R. Shuldiner, H.-P. Chan, and M. A. Helvie
Mammographic Breast Density--Evidence for Genetic Correlations with Established Breast Cancer Risk Factors
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2008; 17(12): 3509 - 3516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. F. Boehm, T. Schneider, S. M. Buhmann-Kirchhoff, T. Schlossbauer, D. Rjosk-Dendorfer, S. Britsch, and M. Reiser
Automated Classification of Breast Parenchymal Density: Topologic Analysis of X-Ray Attenuation Patterns Depicted with Digital Mammography
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6): W275 - W282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. M. Kavanagh, G. B. Byrnes, C. Nickson, J. N. Cawson, G. G. Giles, J. L. Hopper, D. M. Gertig, and D. R. English
Using Mammographic Density to Improve Breast Cancer Screening Outcomes
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2008; 17(10): 2818 - 2824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. Warner, H. Messersmith, P. Causer, A. Eisen, R. Shumak, and D. Plewes
Systematic Review: Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Screen Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer
Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2008; 148(9): 671 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Ding, R. Warren, I. Warsi, N. Day, D. Thompson, M. Brady, C. Tromans, R. Highnam, and D. Easton
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Using Standard Mammogram Form to Predict Breast Cancer Risk: Case-Control Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1074 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. Byrne
Invited Commentary: Assessing Breast Density Change--Lessons for Future Studies
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2008; 167(9): 1037 - 1040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. A. Tice, S. R. Cummings, R. Smith-Bindman, L. Ichikawa, W. E. Barlow, and K. Kerlikowske
Using Clinical Factors and Mammographic Breast Density to Estimate Breast Cancer Risk: Development and Validation of a New Predictive Model
Ann Intern Med, March 4, 2008; 148(5): 337 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. Stuedal, H. Ma, L. Bernstein, M. C. Pike, and G. Ursin
Does Breast Size Modify the Association between Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk?
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2008; 17(3): 621 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
B. J. Fuhrman, B. E. Teter, M. Barba, C. Byrne, A. Cavalleri, B. J. Grant, P. J. Horvath, D. Morelli, E. Venturelli, and P. C. Muti
Equol Status Modifies the Association of Soy Intake and Mammographic Density in a Sample of Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 33 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. S. Hwang, D. L. Miglioretti, R. Ballard-Barbash, D. L. Weaver, K. Kerlikowske, and for the National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Su
Association between Breast Density and Subsequent Breast Cancer Following Treatment for Ductal Carcinoma In situ
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2007; 16(12): 2587 - 2593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. Troisi, N. Potischman, and R. N. Hoover
Exploring the Underlying Hormonal Mechanisms of Prenatal Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: A Review and Commentary
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2007; 16(9): 1700 - 1712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. M. Vachon, T. A. Sellers, E. E. Carlson, J. M. Cunningham, C. A. Hilker, R. L. Smalley, D. J. Schaid, L. E. Kelemen, F. J. Couch, and V. S. Pankratz
Strong Evidence of a Genetic Determinant for Mammographic Density, a Major Risk Factor for Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 67(17): 8412 - 8418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
T. Sellers, C. Vachon, V. Pankratz, C. Janney, Z Fredericksen, K. Brandt, Y Huang, F. Couch, L. Kushi, and J. Cerhan
Association of Childhood and Adolescent Anthropometric Factors, Physical Activity, and Diet with Adult Mammographic Breast Density
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2007; 166(4): 456 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. M. Tamimi, C. Byrne, G. A. Colditz, and S. E. Hankinson
Endogenous Hormone Levels, Mammographic Density, and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 1, 2007; 99(15): 1178 - 1187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
R. J Santen, N. F Boyd, R. T Chlebowski, S. Cummings, J. Cuzick, M. Dowsett, D. Easton, J. F Forbes, T. Key, S. E Hankinson, et al.
Critical assessment of new risk factors for breast cancer: considerations for development of an improved risk prediction model
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 169 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
V. A. McCormack, R. Highnam, N. Perry, and I. dos Santos Silva
Comparison of a New and Existing Method of Mammographic Density Measurement: Intramethod Reliability and Associations with Known Risk Factors
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2007; 16(6): 1148 - 1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. W. Reeves, G. L. Gierach, and F. Modugno
Recreational Physical Activity and Mammographic Breast Density Characteristics
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 934 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
A. Miremadi, M. Z. Oestergaard, P. D.P. Pharoah, and C. Caldas
Cancer genetics of epigenetic genes
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2007; 16(R1): R28 - R49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
F. J.B. van Duijnhoven, P. H.M. Peeters, R. M.L. Warren, S. A. Bingham, P. A.H. van Noord, E. M. Monninkhof, D. E. Grobbee, and C. H. van Gils
Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Changes in Mammographic Density
J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2007; 25(11): 1323 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. G. del Carmen, E. F. Halpern, D. B. Kopans, B. Moy, R. H. Moore, P. E. Goss, and K. S. Hughes
Mammographic Breast Density and Race
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 1147 - 1150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
K. Kerlikowske, L. Ichikawa, D. L. Miglioretti, D. S. M. Buist, P. M. Vacek, R. Smith-Bindman, B. Yankaskas, P. A. Carney, and R. Ballard-Barbash
Longitudinal Measurement of Clinical Mammographic Breast Density to Improve Estimation of Breast Cancer Risk
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 7, 2007; 99(5): 386 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Verheus, P. H.M. Peeters, R. Kaaks, P. A.H. van Noord, D. E. Grobbee, and C. H. van Gils
Premenopausal Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Serum Levels and Changes in Breast Density over Menopause
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2007; 16(3): 451 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. E. Olson, C. X. Ma, L. L. Pelleymounter, D. J. Schaid, V. S. Pankratz, R. A. Vierkant, Z. S. Fredericksen, J. N. Ingle, Y. Wu, F. Couch, et al.
A Comprehensive Examination of CYP19 Variation and Breast Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2007; 16(3): 623 - 625.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
D. Saslow, C. Boetes, W. Burke, S. Harms, M. O. Leach, C. D. Lehman, E. Morris, E. Pisano, M. Schnall, S. Sener, et al.
American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography
CA Cancer J Clin, March 1, 2007; 57(2): 75 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. A. Sickles
Wolfe Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns and Breast Cancer Risk
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 301 - 303.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
N. F. Boyd, H. Guo, L. J. Martin, L. Sun, J. Stone, E. Fishell, R. A. Jong, G. Hislop, A. Chiarelli, S. Minkin, et al.
Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., January 18, 2007; 356(3): 227 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
K. Kerlikowske
The Mammogram That Cried Wolfe
N. Engl. J. Med., January 18, 2007; 356(3): 297 - 300.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. M. Vachon, K. R. Brandt, K. Ghosh, C. G. Scott, S. D. Maloney, M. J. Carston, V. S. Pankratz, and T. A. Sellers
Mammographic Breast Density as a General Marker of Breast Cancer Risk
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
Y. Bremnes, G. Ursin, N. Bjurstam, S. Rinaldi, R. Kaaks, and I. T. Gram
Insulin-like Growth Factor and Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Norwegian Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 57 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
N. F. Boyd, L. J. Martin, L. Sun, H. Guo, A. Chiarelli, G. Hislop, M. Yaffe, and S. Minkin
Body Size, Mammographic Density, and Breast Cancer Risk.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2086 - 2092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L. J Martin, C. V Greenberg, V. Kriukov, S. Minkin, D. J. Jenkins, and N. F Boyd
Intervention with a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet does not influence the timing of menopause.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2006; 84(4): 920 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. J. Fabian and B. F. Kimler
Mammographic Density: Use in Risk Assessment and as a Biomarker in Prevention Trials
J. Nutr., October 1, 2006; 136(10): 2705S - 2708S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
W. E. Barlow, E. White, R. Ballard-Barbash, P. M. Vacek, L. Titus-Ernstoff, P. A. Carney, J. A. Tice, D. S. M. Buist, B. M. Geller, R. Rosenberg, et al.
Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography.
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 6, 2006; 98(17): 1204 - 1214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. Chen, D. Pee, R. Ayyagari, B. Graubard, C. Schairer, C. Byrne, J. Benichou, and M. H. Gail
Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density.
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 6, 2006; 98(17): 1215 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. E. Martin, M. A. Helvie, C. Zhou, M. A. Roubidoux, J. E. Bailey, C. Paramagul, C. E. Blane, K. A. Klein, S. S. Sonnad, and H.-P. Chan
Mammographic Density Measured with Quantitative Computer-aided Method: Comparison with Radiologists' Estimates and BI-RADS Categories
Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 656 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. R. Palomares, J. R.B. Machia, C. D. Lehman, J. R. Daling, and A. McTiernan
Mammographic density correlation with gail model breast cancer risk estimates and component risk factors.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2006; 15(7): 1324 - 1330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Rossini, C. Rumio, L. Sfondrini, E. Tagliabue, D. Morelli, R. Miceli, L. Mariani, M. Palazzo, S. Menard, and A. Balsari
Influence of Antibiotic Treatment on Breast Carcinoma Development in Proto-neu Transgenic Mice.
Cancer Res., June 15, 2006; 66(12): 6219 - 6224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
V. A. McCormack and I. dos Santos Silva
Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2006; 15(6): 1159 - 1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Stone, G. S. Dite, A. Gunasekara, D. R. English, M. R.E McCredie, G. G. Giles, J. N. Cawson, R. A. Hegele, A. M. Chiarelli, M. J. Yaffe, et al.
The heritability of mammographically dense and nondense breast tissue.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2006; 15(4): 612 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. P.M. Suijkerbuijk, F. J.B. Van Duijnhoven, C. H. Van Gils, P. A.H. Van Noord, P. H.M. Peeters, C. M. Friedenreich, and E. M. Monninkhof
Physical activity in relation to mammographic density in the dutch prospect-European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition cohort.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2006; 15(3): 456 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
F. J.B. van Duijnhoven, P. H.M. Peeters, R. M.L. Warren, S. A. Bingham, A. G. Uitterlinden, P. A.H. van Noord, E. M. Monninkhof, D. E. Grobbee, and C. H. van Gils
Influence of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} and Progesterone Receptor Polymorphisms on the Effects of Hormone Therapy on Mammographic Density.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2006; 15(3): 462 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
G. Mitchell, A. C. Antoniou, R. Warren, S. Peock, J. Brown, R. Davies, J. Mattison, M. Cook, I. Warsi, D. G. Evans, et al.
Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers
Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 66(3): 1866 - 1872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Guerrieri-Gonzaga, C. Robertson, B. Bonanni, D. Serrano, M. Cazzaniga, S. Mora, M. Gulisano, H. Johansson, F. Formelli, M. Intra, et al.
Preliminary Results on Safety and Activity of a Randomized, Double-Blind, 2 x 2 Trial of Low-Dose Tamoxifen and Fenretinide for Breast Cancer Prevention in Premenopausal Women
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2006; 24(1): 129 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L. Hilakivi-Clarke, S. E. Olivo, A. Shajahan, G. Khan, Y. Zhu, A. Zwart, E. Cho, and R. Clarke
Mechanisms Mediating the Effects of Prepubertal (n-3) Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Diet on Breast Cancer Risk in Rats
J. Nutr., December 1, 2005; 135(12): 2946S - 2952S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. Haars, P. A.H. van Noord, C. H. van Gils, D. E. Grobbee, and P. H.M. Peeters
Measurements of Breast Density: No Ratio for a Ratio
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2005; 14(11): 2634 - 2640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. M. Tamimi, S. E. Hankinson, G. A. Colditz, and C. Byrne
Endogenous Sex Hormone Levels and Mammographic Density among Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2005; 14(11): 2641 - 2647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
F. J.B. van Duijnhoven, I. D. Bezemer, P. H.M. Peeters, M. Roest, A. G. Uitterlinden, D. E. Grobbee, and C. H. van Gils
Polymorphisms in the Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Gene and Mammographic Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2005; 14(11): 2655 - 2660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M K Simick and L Lilge
Optical transillumination spectroscopy to quantify parenchymal tissue density: an indicator for breast cancer risk
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2005; 78(935): 1009 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
G. A. Greendale, S. L. Palla, G. Ursin, G. A. Laughlin, C. Crandall, M. C. Pike, and B. A. Reboussin
The Association of Endogenous Sex Steroids and Sex Steroid Binding Proteins with Mammographic Density: Results from the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions Mammographic Density Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2005; 162(9): 826 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. D. Pisano, C. Gatsonis, E. Hendrick, M. Yaffe, J. K. Baum, S. Acharyya, E. F. Conant, L. L. Fajardo, L. Bassett, C. D'Orsi, et al.
Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening
N. Engl. J. Med., October 27, 2005; 353(17): 1773 - 1783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
G. Maskarinec, I. Pagano, G. Lurie, L. R. Wilkens, and L. N. Kolonel
Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk: The Multiethnic Cohort Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 15, 2005; 162(8): 743 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. McTiernan, C. F. Martin, J. D. Peck, A. K. Aragaki, R. T. Chlebowski, E. D. Pisano, C. Y. Wang, R. L. Brunner, K. C. Johnson, J. E. Manson, et al.
Estrogen-Plus-Progestin Use and Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women: Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 21, 2005; 97(18): 1366 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
K. Kerlikowske, J. Creasman, J. W. T. Leung, R. Smith-Bindman, and V. L. Ernster
Differences in Screening Mammography Outcomes Among White, Chinese, and Filipino Women
Arch Intern Med, September 12, 2005; 165(16): 1862 - 1868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. Stuedal, I. T. Gram, Y. Bremnes, H. Adlercreutz, M. B. Veierod, and G. Ursin
Plasma Levels of Enterolactone and Percentage Mammographic Density among Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2005; 14(9): 2154 - 2159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Berube, C. Diorio, B. Masse, N. Hebert-Croteau, C. Byrne, G. Cote, M. Pollak, M. Yaffe, and J. Brisson
Vitamin D and Calcium Intakes from Food or Supplements and Mammographic Breast Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2005; 14(7): 1653 - 1659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. R. Cerhan, T. A. Sellers, C. A. Janney, V. S. Pankratz, K. R. Brandt, and C. M. Vachon
Prenatal and Perinatal Correlates of Adult Mammographic Breast Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2005; 14(6): 1502 - 1508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. Torres-Mejia, B. De Stavola, D. S. Allen, J. J. Perez-Gavilan, J. M. Ferreira, I. S. Fentiman, and I. dos Santos Silva
Mammographic Features and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluations in the Guernsey Prospective Studies
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2005; 14(5): 1052 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
K. Kerlikowske, J. Shepherd, J. Creasman, J. A. Tice, E. Ziv, and S. R. Cummings
Are Breast Density and Bone Mineral Density Independent Risk Factors for Breast Cancer?
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 2, 2005; 97(5): 368 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. S. Schernhammer, J. M. Holly, M. N. Pollak, and S. E. Hankinson
Circulating Levels of Insulin-like Growth Factors, their Binding Proteins, and Breast Cancer Risk
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2005; 14(3): 699 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. Ziv, J. Tice, R. Smith-Bindman, J. Shepherd, S. Cummings, and K. Kerlikowske
Mammographic Density and Estrogen Receptor Status of Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2004; 13(12): 2090 - 2095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. Heng, F. Gao, R. Jong, E. Fishell, M. Yaffe, L. Martin, T. Li, J. Stone, L. Sun, J. Hopper, et al.
Risk Factors for Breast Cancer Associated with Mammographic Features in Singaporean Chinese Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2004; 13(11): 1751 - 1758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. S. M. Buist, P. L. Porter, C. Lehman, S. H. Taplin, and E. White
Factors Contributing to Mammography Failure in Women Aged 40-49 Years
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 6, 2004; 96(19): 1432 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
L. A. Habel, J. J. Dignam, S. R. Land, M. Salane, A. M. Capra, and T. B. Julian
Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer After Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 6, 2004; 96(19): 1467 - 1472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Berube, C. Diorio, W. Verhoek-Oftedahl, and J. Brisson
Vitamin D, Calcium, and Mammographic Breast Densities
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2004; 13(9): 1466 - 1472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. Ursin, S. L. Palla, B. A. Reboussin, S. Slone, C. Wasilauskas, M. C. Pike, and G. A. Greendale
Post-Treatment Change in Serum Estrone Predicts Mammographic Percent Density Changes in Women Who Received Combination Estrogen and Progestin in the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., July 15, 2004; 22(14): 2842 - 2848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. G. Richards, D. M. Klotz, M. P. Walker, and R. P. DiAugustine
Mammary Gland Branching Morphogenesis Is Diminished in Mice with a Deficiency of Insulin-like Growth Factor-I (IGF-I), But Not in Mice with a Liver-Specific Deletion of IGF-I
Endocrinology, July 1, 2004; 145(7): 3106 - 3110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Decensi, B. Bonanni, L. Baglietto, A. Guerrieri-Gonzaga, F. Ramazzotto, H. Johansson, C. Robertson, I. Marinucci, F. Mariette, M. T. Sandri, et al.
A Two-by-Two Factorial Trial Comparing Oral with Transdermal Estrogen Therapy and Fenretinide with Placebo on Breast Cancer Biomarkers
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2004; 10(13): 4389 - 4397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. M. Vacek and B. M. Geller
A Prospective Study of Breast Cancer Risk Using Routine Mammographic Breast Density Measurements
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2004; 13(5): 715 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. H. Lai, D. Vesprini, W. Zhang, M. J. Yaffe, M. Pollak, and S. A. Narod
A Polymorphic Locus in the Promoter Region of the IGFBP3 Gene Is Related to Mammographic Breast Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2004; 13(4): 573 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. O. Lillie, L. Bernstein, S. A. Ingles, W. J. Gauderman, G. E. Rivas, V. Gagalang, T. Krontiris, and G. Ursin
Polymorphism in the Androgen Receptor and Mammographic Density in Women Taking and Not Taking Estrogen and Progestin Therapy
Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 64(4): 1237 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
Z. Chen, A. H. Wu, W. J. Gauderman, L. Bernstein, H. Ma, M. C. Pike, and G. Ursin
Does Mammographic Density Reflect Ethnic Differences in Breast Cancer Incidence Rates?
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2004; 159(2): 140 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. B. Halls, P. Crystal, I. Karakis, S. Strano, and M. Koretz
Statistical Comparison of Proportions
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182 (1): 259 - 260.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Harvey and V. E. Bovbjerg
Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Breast Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer Risk
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 29 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. A. Roubidoux, J. S. Kaur, K. A. Griffith, B. Stillwater, P. Novotny, and J. Sloan
Relationship of Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns to Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Smoking in Alaska Native Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2003; 12(10): 1081 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Brisson, C. Diorio, and B. Masse
Wolfe's Parenchymal Pattern and Percentage of the Breast with Mammographic Densities: Redundant or Complementary Classifications?
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2003; 12(8): 728 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
D. Vranjesevic, C. Schiepers, D. H. Silverman, A. Quon, J. Villalpando, M. Dahlbom, M. E. Phelps, and J. Czernin
Relationship Between 18F-FDG Uptake and Breast Density in Women with Normal Breast Tissue
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2003; 44(8): 1238 - 1242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Stone, A. Gunasekara, L. J. Martin, M. Yaffe, S. Minkin, and N. F. Boyd
The Detection of Change in Mammographic Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2003; 12(7): 625 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. A. Roubidoux, J. S. Kaur, K. A. Griffith, J. Sloan, C. Wilson, P. Novotny, and M. Lobell
Correlates of Mammogram Density in Southwestern Native-American Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2003; 12(6): 552 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
E. Ziv, J. Shepherd, R. Smith-Bindman, and K. Kerlikowske
Mammographic Breast Density and Family History of Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 2, 2003; 95(7): 556 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. Ursin, H. Ma, A. H. Wu, L. Bernstein, M. Salane, Y. R. Parisky, M. Astrahan, C. C. Siozon, and M. C. Pike
Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer in Three Ethnic Groups
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2003; 12(4): 332 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
C. V. Clevenger, P. A. Furth, S. E. Hankinson, and L. A. Schuler
The Role of Prolactin in Mammary Carcinoma
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2003; 24(1): 1 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. T. Chlebowski and A. McTiernan
Biological Significance of Interventions That Change Breast Density
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 1, 2003; 95(1): 4 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
G. A. Greendale, B. A. Reboussin, S. Slone, C. Wasilauskas, M. C. Pike, and G. Ursin
Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Change in Mammographic Density
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 1, 2003; 95(1): 30 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. M. Vachon, T. A. Sellers, R. A. Vierkant, F.-F. Wu, and K. R. Brandt
Case-Control Study of Increased Mammographic Breast Density Response to Hormone Replacement Therapy
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2002; 11(11): 1382 - 1388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Prevrhal, J. A Shepherd, R. Smith-Bindman, S. R. Cummings, and K. Kerlikowske
Accuracy of Mammographic Breast Density Analysis: Results of Formal Operator Training
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2002; 11(11): 1389 - 1393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Z. Huo, M. L. Giger, O. I. Olopade, D. E. Wolverton, B. L. Weber, C. E. Metz, W. Zhong, and S. A. Cummings
Computerized Analysis of Digitized Mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Mutation Carriers
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 519 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.