Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1995 87(14):1072-1077; doi:10.1093/jnci/87.14.1072
© 1995 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knick, V. C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knick, V. C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, C. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 87, No. 14, 1072-1077, July 19, 1995
© 1995 Oxford University Press

Vinorelbine Tartrate and Paclitaxel Combinations: Enhanced Activity Against In Vivo P388 Murine Leukemia Cells

Vincent C. Knick*, Derek J. Eberwein, Charles G. Miller

Division of Cell Biology, Burroughs Wellcome Co. Research Triangle Park, NC.

*Correspondence to: Vincent C. Knick, M.S.P.H., Division of Cell Biology, Burroughs Wellcome Co., 3030 Cornwallis Rd., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.

Background: Many critical cellular functions such as mitosis, cell movement, and maintenance of cell structure are performed by microtubules. Antimicrotubule agents (which disrupt or block the formation of microtubules) are among the most widely used anticancer drugs and have contributed to the curative therapy of many neoplasms. Recently, two new antimicrotubule agents, vinorelbine tartrate (Navelbine) and paclitaxel (Taxol) have demonstrated clinical activity against ovarian, breast, and non-small-cell lung carcinomas. These agents target microtubules at different sites, and they both interfere with mitotic spindle function. Since vinorelbine tartrate and paclitaxel have shown a similar antitumor profile in clinical trials thus far, it is reasonable to expect that they may be used interchangeably in some combination therapies or perhaps with each other in the same treatment regimen. Purpose: On the basis of their similar activity profile in clinical trials, we decided to investigate the therapeutic outcome of a vinorelbine tartrate and paclitaxel binary drug combination, even though they appeared to have overlapping toxic effects. We wanted to ascertain the effect of this binary drug combination, in an in vivo setting, as it related to host toxicity and antitumor activity. Methods: CDF-1 female mice that were implanted intraperitoneally with one million P388 murine leukemia cells were treated intraperitoneally with vinorelbine tartrate, paclitaxel, or a combination of the two drugs on a day–1, –5, and –9 dosing schedule. Experimental groups had between five and eight mice per group. Vinorelbine tartrate was administered at either 8, 12, 16, 20, or 24 mg/kg and paclitaxel at either 4.5, 18, or 36 mg/kg. Results: As single agents, neither vinorelbine tartrate nor paclitaxel generated meaningful numbers of 60-day cures (i.e., tumor free at day 60). In contrast, optimal combination regimens produced 60-day cures in more than 80% of the mice. The LD10 (dose lethal to 10% of the mice) of vinorelbine tartrate increased approximately 2.5-fold in the presence of paclitaxel and allowed otherwise lethal vinorelbine tartrate doses to be administered safely, which may have contributed to the antitumor efficacy of the combinations. The effect of the time delay between vinorelbine tartrate and paclitaxel administration on toxicity and cures appeared to be contingent on the vinorelbine tartrate dose. Conclusions: Results suggest that the overlapping toxic effects of vinorelbine tartrate and paclitaxel might not be a deterrent to their use in combination drug therapy. When used appropriately, rather than having enhanced toxic effects, otherwise toxic doses were better tolerated and survival improved over single-agent therapy. [J Natl Cancer Inst 87:1072–1077, 1995]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
W. G. Roberts, P. M. Whalen, E. Soderstrom, G. Moraski, J. P. Lyssikatos, H.-F. Wang, B. Cooper, D. A. Baker, D. Savage, D. Dalvie, et al.
Antiangiogenic and Antitumor Activity of a Selective PDGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, CP-673,451
Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 65(3): 957 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Honore, K. Kamath, D. Braguer, S. B. Horwitz, L. Wilson, C. Briand, and M. A. Jordan
Synergistic Suppression of Microtubule Dynamics by Discodermolide and Paclitaxel in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Cells
Cancer Res., July 15, 2004; 64(14): 4957 - 4964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
E. J. Gapud, R. Bai, A. K. Ghosh, and E. Hamel
Laulimalide and Paclitaxel: A Comparison of Their Effects on Tubulin Assembly and Their Synergistic Action When Present Simultaneously
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2004; 66(1): 113 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. J. Bonham, A. Galkin, B. Montgomery, W. L. Stahl, D. Agus, and P. S. Nelson
Effects of the Herbal Extract PC-SPES on Microtubule Dynamics and Paclitaxel-Mediated Prostate Tumor Growth Inhibition
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 6, 2002; 94(21): 1641 - 1647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. A. Miller, L. M. Krug, K. K. Ng, B. Pizzo, W. Perez, R. T. Heelan, and M. G. Kris
Phase II Trial of Docetaxel and Vinorelbine in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., March 13, 2000; 18(6): 1346 - 1350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Lobert, J. W. Ingram, and J. J. Correia
Additivity of Dilantin and Vinblastine Inhibitory Effects on Microtubule Assembly
Cancer Res., October 1, 1999; 59(19): 4816 - 4822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Dumontet and B. I. Sikic
Mechanisms of Action of and Resistance to Antitubulin Agents: Microtubule Dynamics, Drug Transport, and Cell Death
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 1999; 17(3): 1061 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.