Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1993 85(20):1679-1685; doi:10.1093/jnci/85.20.1679
© 1993 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mattsson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rutqvist, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mattsson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rutqvist, L. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 85, No. 20, 1679-1685, October 20, 1993
© 1993 Oxford University Press

Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-up of Radiation Therapy for Benign Breast Disease

Anders Mattsson, Bengt-Inge Rudén, Per Hall, Nils Wilking, Lars Erik Rutqvist

Oncologic Center, Radiumhemmet, Karohnska Hospital Stockholm, Sweden
Department of Hospital Physics, Radiumhemmet, Karohnska Hospital Stockholm, Sweden
Department of General Oncology, Radiumhemmet, Karohnska Hospital Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence to:Oncologic Center, Karolinska Hospital, S-104 01 Stockholm, Sweden.

Background: From the 1920s through the 1950s, radiation therapy was used in Sweden as a treatment for benign breast diseases. It is now known that exposure of the breast to ionizing radiation increases the relative risk of subsequent breast cancer, especially for younger women. However, the degree to which the patient's age contributes to the elevation of risk for subsequent development of breast cancer is not yet completely understood. Purpose: The purpose was to study the risk of breast cancer after irradiation of the female breast and, in particular, to analyze the duration of the effect and the risk for women older than 40 years at first exposure. Methods: In this cohort study, data were obtained through population-based registers. The exposed group consisted of 1216 women (median age, 40 years) who, during the period spanning 1925 through 1954, received radiation therapy for benign breast disease. The reference group consisted of 1874 women (median age, 36 years) who had the same diagnosis during that time period but did not receive radiation therapy. The radiation doses were determined from the original medical records (mean dose, 5.8 Gy; range, 0.003–50.1 Gy). The follow-up lasted up to 60 years after first exposure. The incidence rate ratio was analyzed with Poisson regression models. Results: The total number of breast cancers in the exposed cohort was 198 versus 101 in the unexposed cohort. Overall, the radiation-associated incidence rate ratio was 3.58 (95% confidence interval = 2.77–4.63). The dose-response gradient was statistically significant (P<.001) but leveled off at higher doses. The incidence rate ratios decreased starting about 25 years after first exposure but were at increased levels throughout the entire follow-up period. The incidence rate ratio decreased with age at first exposure but was significantly increased (P<.001) even when the age at time of first exposure was greater than 40 years. Conclusions: Total dose, age at first exposure, and time since first exposure were all determinants of the incidence rate ratio of breast cancer after exposure of the breast to ionizing radiation. A statistically significant increase in the incidence of breast cancer following radiation treatment of various benign breast diseases was observed even among women older than 40 years at the time of first treatment. Implications: These findings need to be considered when weighing the relative benefits versus risks of generalized screening of younger women for breast cancer by mammography. [J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 1679–1685, 1993]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. M. Ronckers, M. M. Doody, J. E. Lonstein, M. Stovall, and C. E. Land
Multiple Diagnostic X-rays for Spine Deformities and Risk of Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2008; 17(3): 605 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
K. Armstrong, E. Moye, S. Williams, J. A. Berlin, and E. E. Reynolds
Screening Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians
Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 516 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
D. A. Hill, E. Gilbert, G. M. Dores, M. Gospodarowicz, F. E. van Leeuwen, E. Holowaty, B. Glimelius, M. Andersson, T. Wiklund, C. F. Lynch, et al.
Breast cancer risk following radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma: modification by other risk factors
Blood, November 15, 2005; 106(10): 3358 - 3365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. C. Park, R. L. Henshall-Powell, A. C. Erickson, R. Talhouk, B. Parvin, M. J. Bissell, and M. H. Barcellos-Hoff
Ionizing radiation induces heritable disruption of epithelial cell interactions
PNAS, September 16, 2003; 100(19): 10728 - 10733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
F. E. van Leeuwen, W. J. Klokman, M. Stovall, E. C. Dahler, M. B. van't Veer, E. M. Noordijk, M. A. Crommelin, B. M. P. Aleman, A. Broeks, M. Gospodarowicz, et al.
Roles of Radiation Dose, Chemotherapy, and Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer Following Hodgkin's Disease
J Natl Cancer Inst, July 2, 2003; 95(13): 971 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. H. Barcellos-Hoff and S. A. Ravani
Irradiated Mammary Gland Stroma Promotes the Expression of Tumorigenic Potential by Unirradiated Epithelial Cells
Cancer Res., March 1, 2000; 60(5): 1254 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.