Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1993 85(13):1074-1080; doi:10.1093/jnci/85.13.1074
© 1993 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lerman, C.
Right arrow Articles by Engstrom, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lerman, C.
Right arrow Articles by Engstrom, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 85, No. 13, 1074-1080, July 7, 1993
© 1993 Oxford University Press

Mammography Adherence and Psychological Distress Among Women at Risk for Breast Cancer

Caryn Lerman, Mary Daly, Colleen Sands, Andrew Balshem, Edward Lustbader, Tracy Heggan, Lori Goldstein, Joan James, Paul Engstrom*

Fox Chase Cancer Center Philadelphia, Pa

Correspondence to: Caryn Lerman, Ph.D., Fox Chase Cancer Center, 510 Township Line Rd., Cheltenham, PA 19012.

BACKGROUND:: Previous studies estimate that first-degree relatives of women with breast cancer have a twofold to 10-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. Recently, attention has focused on the mammography screening practices of women who are at high risk for breast cancer.

PURPOSE:: Our purpose was to characterize mammography screening practices in a sample of first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients and to identify variables that may serve as barriers to or facilitators of adherence to mammography.

METHODS:: Cross-sectional (rather than prospective) data were collected by telephone interviews with 140 women aged 35–79 years who had a family history of breast cancer in at least one first-degree relative (mother, sister, or daughter). Data were recorded on mammography screening patterns, depression, stress impact, and breast cancer worries. Results: Women whose mammography history adhered to age-specific recommendations varied by age: 76% of first-degree relatives aged 35–39 years, 86% aged 40–49 years, and 63% aged 50 years or more. In bivariate analyses, level of education (P & equals; .001), employment (P = .046), and time since diagnosis of the index patient (P = .044) were significantly and positively associated with mammography adherence. Variables associated negatively with adherence included age (P = .019), intrusive thoughts about breast cancer (P = .042), and breast cancer worries that interfered with daily functioning (P = .004). Multivariate analysis by logistic regression indicated that only breast cancer worries (odds ratio [OR] = 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09–5.9) and education (OR = 4.8; CI = 1.6–14.3) were significant independent predictors of mammogaphy adherence.

CONCLUSIONS:: This study suggests that most women at high risk for breast cancer adhere to the recommended mammography screening guidelines of the National Cancer Institute. However, rates of adherence among high-risk women aged 50 years and older are suboptimal; only 63% of these women received annual screening mammograms, and 13% had never been screened. Breast cancer worries may pose a barrier to mammography adherence among high-risk women, particularly those with less formal education.

IMPLICATIONS:: Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to validate the present findings and to evaluate the impact of psychoeducational interventions for women with affected first-degree relatives. [J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 1074–1080, 1993]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Service ResearchHome page
E. Gelfand Miller, M. F. Luce, B. E. Kahn, and E. F. Conant
Understanding Emotional Reactions for Negative Services: The Impact of Efficacy Beliefs and Stage in Process
Journal of Service Research, August 1, 2009; 12(1): 87 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. M. Lippman and E. T. Hawk
Cancer Prevention: From 1727 to Milestones of the Past 100 Years
Cancer Res., July 1, 2009; 69(13): 5269 - 5284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Prevention ResearchHome page
S. M. Lippman
Cancer Prevention Research: Back to the Future
Cancer Prevention Research, June 1, 2009; 2(6): 503 - 513.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. E. Kim, E. J. Perez-Stable, S. Wong, S. Gregorich, G. F. Sawaya, J. M. E. Walsh, and C. P. Kaplan
Association Between Cancer Risk Perception and Screening Behavior Among Diverse Women
Arch Intern Med, April 14, 2008; 168(7): 728 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. Rondanina, M. Puntoni, G. Severi, C. Varricchio, A. Zunino, I. Feroce, B. Bonanni, and A. Decensi
Psychological and Clinical Factors Implicated in Decision Making About a Trial of Low-Dose Tamoxifen in Hormone Replacement Therapy Users
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2008; 26(9): 1537 - 1543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
J. Brown Sofair and M. Lehlbach
The Role of Anxiety in a Mammography Screening Program
Psychosomatics, February 1, 2008; 49(1): 49 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
M. J. Heinig, J. R. Follett, K. D. Ishii, K. Kavanagh-Prochaska, R. Cohen, and J. Panchula
Barriers to Compliance With Infant-Feeding Recommendations Among Low-income Women
J Hum Lact, February 1, 2006; 22(1): 27 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. P. Kaplan, J. S. Haas, E. J. Perez-Stable, S. E. Gregorich, C. Somkin, G. Des Jarlais, and K. Kerlikowske
Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Options: Awareness, Discussion, and Use among Women from Four Ethnic Groups
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2006; 15(1): 162 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. L. Bober, L. A. Hoke, R. B. Duda, M. M. Regan, and N. M. Tung
Decision-Making About Tamoxifen in Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer: Clinical and Psychological Factors
J. Clin. Oncol., December 15, 2004; 22(24): 4951 - 4957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
J. L. Bottorff, C. Richardson, L. G. Balneaves, M. McCullum, J. A. Buxton, P. A. Ratner, and T. Hack
Unraveling women's perceptions of risk for breast cancer
Health Educ. Res., August 1, 2004; 19(4): 469 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. Eng and D. Iglehart
Decision Aids From Genetics to Treatment of Breast Cancer: Long-term Clinical Utility or Temporary Solution?
JAMA, July 28, 2004; 292(4): 496 - 498.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
N. M. Lindberg and D. K. Wellisch
Identification of Traumatic Stress Reactions in Women at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer
Psychosomatics, February 1, 2004; 45(1): 7 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
M. Gurevich, G. M. Devins, C. Wilson, D. McCready, C. R. Marmar, and G. M. Rodin
Stress Response Syndromes in Women Undergoing Mammography: A Comparison of Women With and Without a History of Breast Cancer
Psychosom Med, January 1, 2004; 66(1): 104 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Standards for the Diagnosis and Management of Individuals with Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2003; 168(7): 818 - 900.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
L. Cohen, R. T. Fouladi, R. J. Babaian, V. A. Bhadkamkar, P. A. Parker, C. C. Taylor, M. A. Smith, E. R. Gritz, and K. Basen-Engquist
Cancer Worry Is Associated with Abnormal Prostate-specific Antigen Levels in Men Participating in a Community Screening Program
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2003; 12(7): 610 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. H. Gann and M. Morrow
Combined Hormone Therapy and Breast Cancer: A Single-Edged Sword
JAMA, June 25, 2003; 289(24): 3304 - 3306.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. A. Smith, D. Saslow, K. Andrews Sawyer, W. Burke, M. E. Costanza, W. P. Evans III, R. S. Foster Jr., E. Hendrick, H. J. Eyre, and S. Sener
American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Update 2003
CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2003; 53(3): 141 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. R. Andersen, R. Smith, H. Meischke, D. Bowen, and N. Urban
Breast Cancer Worry and Mammography Use by Women with and without a Family History in a Population-based Sample
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2003; 12(4): 314 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
B. E. Kahn and M. F. Luce
Understanding High-Stakes Consumer Decisions: Mammography Adherence Following False-Alarm Test Results
Marketing Science, January 1, 2003; 22(3): 393 - 410.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. S. Thompson, H. B. Valdimarsdottir, C. Duteau-Buck, J. Guevarra, D. H. Bovbjerg, C. Richmond-Avellaneda, D. Amarel, D. Godfrey, K. Brown, and K. Offit
Psychosocial Predictors of BRCA Counseling and Testing Decisions among Urban African-American Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2002; 11(12): 1579 - 1585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. Y. Chen, J. E. Garber, S. Higham, K. A. Schneider, K. B. Davis, A. M. Deffenbaugh, T. S. Frank, R. S. Gelman, and F. P. Li
BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing in the Community Setting
J. Clin. Oncol., November 15, 2002; 20(22): 4485 - 4492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. L. Taylor, R. A. Shelby, M. D. Schwartz, J. Ackerman, V. H. LaSalle, E. P. Gelmann, and C. McGuire
The Impact of Item Order on Ratings of Cancer Risk Perception
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2002; 11(7): 654 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
C. Foster, M. Watson, C. Moynihan, A. Ardern-jones, and R. Eeles
Genetic Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Predisposition: Cancer Burden and Responsibility
J Health Psychol, July 1, 2002; 7(4): 469 - 484.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. M. Murabito, J. C. Evans, M. G. Larson, B. E. Kreger, G. L. Splansky, K. M. Freund, M. A. Moskowitz, and P. W. F. Wilson
Family Breast Cancer History and Mammography: Framingham Offspring Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2001; 154(10): 916 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
K. Aktan-Collan, A. Haukkala, J.-P. Mecklin, A. Uutela, and H. Kaariainen
Comprehension of cancer risk one and 12 months after predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer
J. Med. Genet., November 1, 2001; 38(11): 787 - 792.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
W. F. Lawrence, B. N. Peshkin, W. Liang, C. Isaacs, C. Lerman, and J. S. Mandelblatt
Cost of Genetic Counseling and Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Breast Cancer Susceptibility Mutations
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2001; 10(5): 475 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
L. D. Cameron and M. A. Diefenbach
Responses to Information about Psychosocial Consequences of Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Susceptibility: Influences of Cancer Worry and Risk Perceptions
J Health Psychol, January 1, 2001; 6(1): 47 - 59.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
H. J. Smedira
Practical Issues in Counseling Healthy Women About Their Breast Cancer Risk and Use of Tamoxifen Citrate
Arch Intern Med, November 13, 2000; 160(20): 3034 - 3042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
K. Brain, J. Gray, P. Norman, E. France, C. Anglim, G. Barton, E. Parsons, A. Clarke, H. Sweetland, M. Tischkowitz, et al.
Randomized Trial of a Specialist Genetic Assessment Service for Familial Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 16, 2000; 92(16): 1345 - 1351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. Meiser, P. Butow, M. Friedlander, V. Schnieden, M. Gattas, J. Kirk, G. Suthers, E. Haan, and K. Tucker
Intention to Undergo Prophylactic Bilateral Mastectomy in Women at Increased Risk of Developing Hereditary Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., June 11, 2000; 18(11): 2250 - 2257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
B. MEISER, P. BUTOW, A. BARRATT, G. SUTHERS, M. SMITH, A. COLLEY, E. THOMPSON, and K. TUCKER
Attitudes to genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer
J. Med. Genet., June 1, 2000; 37(6): 472 - 476.
[Full Text]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Dorval, A. F. Patenaude, K. A. Schneider, S. A. Kieffer, L. DiGianni, K. J. Kalkbrenner, J. I. Bromberg, L. A. Basili, K. Calzone, J. Stopfer, et al.
Anticipated Versus Actual Emotional Reactions to Disclosure of Results of Genetic Tests for Cancer Susceptibility: Findings From p53 and BRCA1 Testing Programs
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2000; 18(10): 2135 - 2142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
P. F.M. Stalmeier, I. J. Unic, L. C.G. Verhoef, and W. A.J. Van Daal
Evaluation of a Shared Decision Making Program for Women Suspected to Have a Genetic Predisposition to Breast Cancer: Preliminary Results
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1999; 19(3): 230 - 241.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. Bowen, A. McTiernan, W. Burke, D. Powers, J. Pruski, S. Durfy, J. Gralow, and K. Malone
Participation in Breast Cancer Risk Counseling Among Women With a Family History
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 1999; 8(7): 581 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. Lerman, C. Hughes, B. J. Trock, R. E. Myers, D. Main, A. Bonney, M. R. Abbaszadegan, A. E. Harty, B. A. Franklin, J. F. Lynch, et al.
Genetic Testing in Families With Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colon Cancer
JAMA, May 5, 1999; 281(17): 1618 - 1622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
K. Brain, P. Norman, J. Gray, and R. Mansel
Anxiety and Adherence to Breast Self-Examination in Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer
Psychosom Med, March 1, 1999; 61(2): 181 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
A. C. Marcus
New Directions for Risk Communication Research: a Discussion With Additional Suggestions
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, January 1, 1999; 1999(25): 35 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
S. W. Vernon
Risk Perception and Risk Communication for Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Review
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, January 1, 1999; 1999(25): 101 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
O. Gilbar
Coping With Threat: Implications for Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer
Psychosomatics, August 1, 1998; 39(4): 329 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. Lerman and R. Croyle
Psychological Issues in Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Susceptibility
Arch Intern Med, March 28, 1994; 154(6): 609 - 616.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.