Skip Navigation


Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on July 28, 2009
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2009 101(17):1206-1215; doi:10.1093/jnci/djp239
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/17/1206    most recent
djp239v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mohile, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mohile, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, W.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles in JNCI
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press.

ARTICLES

Association of a Cancer Diagnosis With Vulnerability and Frailty in Older Medicare Beneficiaries

Supriya Gupta Mohile, Ying Xian, William Dale, Susan G. Fisher, Miriam Rodin, Gary R. Morrow, Alfred Neugut, William Hall

Affiliations of authors: James P. Wilmot Cancer Center (SGM), Department of Community and Preventive Medicine (YX, SGF), Department of Radiation Oncology (GRM), and Department of Medicine, Section of Geriatrics (WH), University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Department of Medicine, Section of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL (WD); Department of Medicine, St Louis University, St Louis, MI (MR); Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, NY (AN)

Correspondence to: Supriya Gupta Mohile, MD, MS, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box 704, Rochester, NY 14642 (e-mail: supriya_mohile{at}urmc.rochester.edu).

Background: Few studies have evaluated the independent effect of a cancer diagnosis on vulnerability and frailty, which have been associated with adverse health outcomes in older adults.

Methods: We used data in the 2003 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey from a nationally representative sample of 12 480 community-dwelling elders. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate whether cancer was independently associated with vulnerability and frailty. Measures of vulnerability and frailty included disability, geriatric syndromes, self-rated health, and scores on two assessment tools for elderly cancer patients—the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13) and the Balducci frailty criteria. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: Diagnosis of a non-skin cancer was reported by 18.8% of the respondents. Compared with respondents without a cancer history, respondents with a personal history of cancer had a statistically significantly higher prevalence of limitations in activities of daily living (31.9% vs 26.9%), limitations in instrumental activities of daily living (49.5% vs 42.3%), geriatric syndromes (60.8% vs 53.9%), low self-rated health (27.4% vs 20.9%), score of 3 or higher on the VES-13 (45.8% vs 39.5%), and satisfying criteria for frailty as defined by Balducci (79.6% vs 73.4%) (P < .001 for all characteristics). After adjustment for confounders, a cancer diagnosis was found to be associated with low self-rated health (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30 to 1.64; relative risk [RR] = 1.33), limitations in activities of daily living (adjusted OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.33; RR = 1.13), limitations in instrumental activities of daily living (adjusted OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.38; RR = 1.13), a geriatric syndrome (adjusted OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.41; RR = 1.11), VES-13 score of 3 or higher (adjusted OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.41; RR = 1.14), and frailty (adjusted OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.29 to 1.65; RR = 1.09) as defined by Balducci criteria.

Conclusion: Diagnosis of a non-skin cancer was associated with increased levels of having disability, having geriatric syndromes, and meeting criteria for vulnerability and frailty.



CONTEXT AND CAVEATS

Prior knowledge

Relatively few studies have evaluated the relationship between a cancer diagnosis in older adults and their vulnerability and frailty, which have been associated with adverse health outcomes in this population.

Study design

Cross-sectional study that used data from the 2003 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey from a nationally representative sample of 12 480 community-dwelling elders. Statistical models were used to evaluate whether cancer was independently associated with vulnerability and frailty.

Contribution

Older adults with a diagnosis of a non-skin cancer were more likely to have more disabilities and geriatric syndromes and to meet criteria for vulnerability and frailty.

Implications

Assessment of underlying vulnerability and frailty should aid in the design of future clinical trials that are directed not only at improving survival but also at maintaining function, enhancing quality of life, and preventing geriatric syndromes.

Limitations

The cohort of cancer patients was heterogeneous. It could not be determined whether cancer or its treatment directly caused vulnerability or frailty in older patients. The number of patients with some cancer subtypes was small. Geriatric syndromes were self-reported. The assessment tools used in this study have not been validated in independent cohorts of older adults with cancer.

From the Editors

 
Manuscript received June 3, 2009; revised June 3, 2009; accepted June 26, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related Articles in JNCI

IN THIS ISSUE
J Natl Cancer Inst 2009 101: 1159. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Erratum
J Natl Cancer Inst 2009 101: 1433. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]





Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.