Skip Navigation


Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on December 9, 2008
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2008 100(24):1755-1762; doi:10.1093/jnci/djn383
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/24/1755    most recent
djn383v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yabroff, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Feuer, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yabroff, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Feuer, E. J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles in JNCI
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2008.

ARTICLES

Estimates and Projections of Value of Life Lost From Cancer Deaths in the United States

K. Robin Yabroff, Cathy J. Bradley, Angela B. Mariotto, Martin L. Brown, Eric J. Feuer

Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (KRY, ABM, MLB, EJF); Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (CJB)

Correspondence to: K. Robin Yabroff, PhD, MBA, Health Services and Economics Branch/Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Executive Plaza North, Rm 4005, 6130 Executive Blvd, MSC 7344, Bethesda, MD 20892-7344 (e-mail: yabroffr{at}mail.nih.gov).

Background: Value-of-life methods are increasingly used in policy analyses of the economic burden of disease. The purpose of this study was to estimate and project the value of life lost from cancer deaths in the United States.

Methods: We estimated and projected US age-specific mortality rates for all cancers and for 16 types of cancer in men and 18 cancers in women in the years 2000–2020 and applied them to US population projections to estimate the number of deaths in each year. Cohort life tables were used to calculate the remaining life expectancy in the absence of cancer deaths—the person-years of life lost (PYLL). We used a willingness-to-pay approach in which the value of life lost due to cancer death was calculated by multiplying PYLL by an estimate of the value of 1 year of life ($150 000). We performed sensitivity analyses for female breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers using varying assumptions about future cancer mortality rates through the year 2020.

Results: The value of life lost from all cancer deaths in the year 2000 was $960.6 billion; lung cancer alone represented more than 25% of this value. Projections for the year 2020 with current cancer mortality rates showed a 53% increase in the total value of life lost ($1472.5 billion). Projected annual decreases of cancer mortality rates of 2% reduced the expected value of life lost in the year 2020 from $121.0 billion to $80.7 billion for breast cancer, $140.1 billion to $93.5 billion for colorectal cancer, from $433.4 billion to $289.4 billion for lung cancer, and from $58.4 billion to $39.0 billion for prostate cancer.

Conclusions: Estimated value of life lost due to cancer deaths in the United States is substantial and expected to increase dramatically, even if mortality rates remain constant, because of expected population changes. These estimates and projections may help target investments in cancer control strategies to tumor sites that are likely to result in the greatest burden of disease and to interventions that are the most cost-effective.



CONTEXT AND CAVEATS

Prior knowledge

Estimates of value of life lost due to premature death are useful in determining the economic burden of disease.

Study design

Person-years of life lost (PYLL) due to cancer deaths for the years 2000–2020 from 16 types of cancer in men and 18 types in women were estimated and projected and used to calculate the total value of life lost due to cancer deaths during this period and the reductions in this amount that would occur if cancer mortality rates declined during the period. The value of a year of life was based on previous estimates.

Contribution

Based on a value of $150 000 for 1 year of life, the value of life lost from all cancer deaths was $960.6 billion in 2000 and was projected to be $1472.5 billion in 2020. Compared with projections of current mortality rates, projected annual decreases of cancer mortality rates of 2% reduced the expected value of life lost in the year 2020 from $121.0 billion to $80.7 billion for breast cancer, from $140.1 billion to $93.5 billion for colorectal cancer, from $433.4 billion to $289.4 billion for lung cancer, and from $58.4 billion to $39.0 billion for prostate cancer.

Implications

The value of life lost due to death from cancer is large and is expected to increase if mortality rates do not change. Such estimates of the value of life lost due to cancer death estimates such as these may be useful in targeting interventions to cancers that are likely to result in the greatest burden of disease.

Limitations

Misclassification of which type of tumor was the cause of death (eg, lung metastasis may be coded as lung cancer rather than cancer of the primary tumor) may have led to overestimation for some cancer sites. Use of all causes of death (including cancer) to approximate non-cancer deaths in estimation of PYLL may have led to underestimation.

From the Editors

 
Manuscript received February 7, 2008; revised August 22, 2008; accepted September 24, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related Articles in JNCI

IN THIS ISSUE
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 1741. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Economic Cost of Cancer Mortality Is High in U.S., Regardless of How Cost Is Measured
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 1741. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
C. J. Bradley, K. R. Yabroff, B. Dahman, E. J. Feuer, A. Mariotto, and M. L. Brown
Productivity Costs of Cancer Mortality in the United States: 2000-2020
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 17, 2008; 100(24): 1763 - 1770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. D. Ramsey
How Should We Value Lives Lost to Cancer?
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 17, 2008; 100(24): 1742 - 1743.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.